Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Crosby, 338 So. 2d 584.
-
State v. Owens
565 So. 2d 1062
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
Owens’ he reserved his right to appeal.
- State v. Boudreaux 565 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Barrow 564 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
-
State v. Wright
562 So. 2d 1192
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
40:983 (conditional discharge for possession as first offense)
- State v. Schaub 563 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Russland Enterprises, Inc. 562 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Brumfield 560 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Chauvin 560 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Longo 560 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Johnson 558 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- State v. Brown 558 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Cutrera 558 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-
State v. Harlan
556 So. 2d 256
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Pursuant to a plea bargain, he pled guilty to the first charge, reserving his right to appeal the ruling on the motion to suppress
- State v. Tolliver 556 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
-
State v. Weiland
556 So. 2d 175
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
Glen Weiland, defendant/appellant, pled guilty to the offense charged, (La.
- State v. Davis 555 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
-
State v. Hall
555 So. 2d 495
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Defendants then pled guilty to the possession of cocaine charges
- State v. White 554 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
- State v. Mashaw 554 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
-
State v. Albert
553 So. 2d 967
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Defendant pleaded guilty as charged on all counts, reserving his right to appeal as per State v. *969 Crosby
-
State v. Forest
553 So. 2d 935
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
The defendant pled guilty while reserving his right to contest the trial court’s ruling on the mo *936
- State v. Jones 553 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
- State v. Martinez 552 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
- State v. Rawls 552 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
State v. Parker
552 So. 2d 771
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
In that opinion, this Court did not consider the defendant’s assignments of error relating to his motions to suppress
- State v. Cabanas 552 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
State v. Darby
550 So. 2d 963
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
On that same date, the defendant withdrew his not guilty pleas and entered pleas of guilty, to seek appellate review of the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress.
- State v. DeBlanc 549 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
State v. Cohen
549 So. 2d 884
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
After denial of a motion to suppress, he pleaded guilty to an amended charge of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute [R.S.
-
State v. Johnson
550 So. 2d 205
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
These motions were denied at trial instituted prior to the defendant’s
- State v. Anderson 547 So. 2d 3 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- State v. Smith 546 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- State v. Peters 546 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
State v. Tyler
548 So. 2d 24
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
40:966, reserving his right to appeal the trial court’s
- State v. Gervais 546 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
-
State v. Hill
546 So. 2d 212
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Motions to suppress the evidence, the defendant’s
- State v. Gervais 546 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
State v. Newsome
544 So. 2d 82
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Following the trial judge’s ruling, defendant withdrew his previously entered plea of not guilty and entered a plea of guilty to two counts of unauthorized use of a credit card, reserving his right to appeal the judge’s *84 (La.1976).
-
State v. Guidry
544 So. 2d 634
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Defendant withdrew his plea of not guilty and entered a plea of nolo contendere, reserving his right to appeal the trial court’s
- State v. Gamboa 543 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
State v. Hensley
544 So. 2d 47
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Hensley then withdrew his former plea of not guilty and tendered a
-
State v. Peters
542 So. 2d 592
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Subsequently, thereby reserving his right to appeal the trial court's denial of the motion to suppress.
- State v. Walter 542 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- State v. Jarmon 543 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- State v. Russland Enterprises, Inc. 542 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
State v. Morgan
540 So. 2d 614
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
40:969), to appeal from the denial of his motion to suppress physical evidence.
- State v. Dennis 540 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- State v. Bordelon 538 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
-
State v. Lee
539 So. 2d 753
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Defendant’s guilty plea was conditioned upon the reservation of his right to appeal the trial court’s refusal to suppress evidence
-
State v. Rosales
537 So. 2d 850
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Subsequently defendant withdrew her not-guilty plea and tendered a plea of guilty as charged, thereby reserving her right to appeal the denial of her motion to suppress.