Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Kinnemann, 337 So. 2d 441.

33 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Troy Collins La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
State v. Broussard 769 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
the Supreme Court found that “when the officers stopped the Cadillac, drew their weapons, ordered the defendants out of the car, and had them place their hands on the vehicle, an arrest occurred.” the Court found that defendants were arrested where police officers stopped their vehicle using blue lights and a siren, removed the defendant from the vehicle, and | sphysically restrained the defendants before contraband was found in the vehicle.
State v. Simmons 663 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
the Louisiana Supreme Court found insufficient facts upon which to base a finding of probable cause where the defendant entered a residence under surveillance by the police as a suspected drug outlet empty-handed and emerged a short time later carrying two paper bags, even though the defendant looked up and
State v. Bruser 661 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
which found an arrest where officers activated their blue lights and siren to stop the defendant's vehicle, ordered the defendant from the car and restrained him until contraband was found.
State v. Isaac 639 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
In support of his argument, and its progeny.
State v. Tucker 626 So. 2d 707 La. 1993
State v. Moreno 619 So. 2d 62 La. 1993
State v. Perry 610 So. 2d 746 La. 1992
State v. Williams 592 So. 2d 1286 La. 1992
See, State v. Hernandez, supra
Allen v. State Bd. of Dentistry 543 So. 2d 908 La. 1989
1982); (1977); L. Hargrave, The Declaration of Rights of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974, 35 La.L.Rev.
State v. Church 538 So. 2d 993 La. 1989
State v. Barnes 489 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961) (exclusion based on Fourth Amendment); (applying La.
State v. Davis 452 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
State v. Walker 430 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
407 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963); (La.
State v. Buckley 426 So. 2d 103 La. 1983
This court also found insufficient facts upon which to base a where defendant entered a residence under surveillance by the police as a suspected drug *109 outlet empty-handed and emerged a short time later carrying two paper bags, even though defendant looked up and down before crossing the street and had a changed demeanor after leaving the residence.
State v. Ludwig 423 So. 2d 1073 La. 1982
1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961) (exclusion based on Fourth Amendment); (applying La.
State v. Blanton 400 So. 2d 661 La. 1981
wherein defendant left the house suspected to contain marijuana; wherein defendant exited a residence known as a drug outlet; wherein defendant left a house where marijuana was being sold.
State v. Armstead 385 So. 2d 241 La. 1980
State v. Nelson 381 So. 2d 477 La. 1980
If a policeman does not have probable cause to arrest a person because he was seen by the police with a paper sack leaving a place designated as a drug outlet by a reliable confidential informant who had seen contraband there, there certainly cannot be probable cause to search Nelson's house because a person who visited it carrying a paper sack was seen earlier in the company of Carter, from whom confidential reliable informants had bought an unknown quantity of drugs on unspecified occasions.
State v. Brown 366 So. 2d 550 La. 1979
State v. Wilson 366 So. 2d 1328 La. 1978
Thus, the opinion by Dixon, J., notes that to the extent Art. 1, § 5, La.Const.
State v. Matthews 366 So. 2d 1348 La. 1978
See, e. g., State v. Davis, supra ; State v. Smith, supra
State v. Williams 366 So. 2d 1369 La. 1978
State v. Washington 364 So. 2d 958 La. 1978
a stop of a vehicle and subsequent discovery of contraband was ruled by us to have been made without probable cause, where the only basis for the stop was the observation by police that the defendant emerged from a "drug center" holding two paper bags.
State v. Davis 359 So. 2d 986 La. 1978
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); (La.
State v. Stewart 357 So. 2d 1111 La. 1978
State v. Herbert 351 So. 2d 434 La. 1977
[2] Accordingly, we note, (1976): "These `facts' cannot be said to furnish probable cause for an arrest or search.
State v. Smith 347 So. 2d 1127 La. 1977
State v. Thomas 349 So. 2d 270 La. 1977
State v. Shivers 346 So. 2d 657 La. 1977
State v. Culotta 343 So. 2d 977 La. 1977
State v. Kinnemann, La., (docket no. 57,581, September 13, 1976)
State v. Ranker 343 So. 2d 189 La. 1977
State v. Clift 339 So. 2d 755 La. 1976
handed down September 13, 1976; State v. Truss, supra ; State v. Saia, supra .