DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Babin, 336 So. 2d 780.

21 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Sharrieff M. Kent La. 2024
    (where reference to a “mug shot” was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by defendant); State v. Harris, 258 La.
  • State v. Lee 217 So. 3d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    (where reference to a “mug shot” was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by defendant); State v. Harris, 258 La.
  • State v. Jones 188 So. 3d 268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    State v. Hall, 43,125 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), , writ denied, 2008-1511 (La.3/13/09), ; State v. Gay, 29,434 (La.App.2d Cir.6/18/97), ; State v. Bonnee, 2002-0637 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Marcus Gene Hollier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    (where reference to a “mug shot” was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by Defendant); State v. Harris, 258 La.
  • State v. Hollier 37 So. 3d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    (where reference to a “mug shot” was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by Defendant); State v. Harris, 258 La.
  • State v. Hall 986 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Gay, 29,434 (La.App.
  • State v. Young 938 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    (where reference to a "mug shot" was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by defendant); State v. Harris, 258 La.
  • State v. Clark 924 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    (where reference to a "mug shot" was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by Defendant); State v. Harris, 258 La.
  • State of Louisiana v. William L. Giles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    (where reference to a “mug shot” was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by defendant); State v. Harris, 258 La.
  • State v. Giles 884 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    (where reference to a "mug shot" was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by defendant); State v. Harris, 258 La.
  • State v. Brown 871 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    (where reference to a "mug shot" was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by defendant); State v. Harris, 258 La.
  • State v. Bradford 846 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    (where reference to a "mug shot" was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by defendant); State v. Harris, 258 La.
  • State v. Prudhomme 829 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    (where reference to a "mug shot" was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by defendant); State v. Harris, 258 La.
  • State v. Williams 811 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    (where reference to a "mug shot" was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by Defendant); State v. Harris, 258 La.
  • State v. Dillion 770 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    (where reference to a "mug shot" was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by defendant); State v. Harris, 258 La.
  • State v. Edwards 750 So. 2d 893 La. 1999
    (where reference to a "mug shot" was not unmistakable reference to a crime committed by defendant); State v. Harris, 258 La.
  • State v. Gay 697 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    where the defense refused the trial court's admonition.
  • State v. Leeming 612 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Grigsby 445 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    especially if the remark was precipitated by or should have been anticipated by the district attorney...” See also:
  • State v. Joseph 437 So. 2d 280 La. 1983
  • State v. Hammontree 363 So. 2d 1364 La. 1978