DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Prater, 337 So. 2d 1107.

25 citing documents.

  • State v. English 243 So. 3d 1145 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. King 88 So. 3d 1147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. TREMAIN P. 956 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Johnson 820 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Alexis 738 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Peddy 569 So. 2d 1035 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Hallal 544 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    App. 1st Cir.1987), writ denied
  • State v. Comeaux 524 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Marchese 430 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Albert 430 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Gremillion 428 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Hooks 421 So. 2d 880 La. 1983
  • State v. Sugar 408 So. 2d 1329 La. 1982
  • State v. Parish 405 So. 2d 1080 La. 1981
  • State v. Williams 392 So. 2d 619 La. 1980
    1977); 1110 (La.1976) (Tate, J., concurring) (Calogero, J., dissenting).
  • State v. Baylis 388 So. 2d 713 La. 1980
  • State v. Carthan 377 So. 2d 308 La. 1979
  • State v. Washington 367 So. 2d 4 La. 1978
    a majority of this court indicated that Blackwell would not apply "when the statutory offense requires a mandatory legislative penalty, with no judicial discretion as to its imposition following verdict."
  • State v. Washington 367 So. 2d 4 La. 1978
    a majority of this court indicated that Blackwell would not apply “when the statutory offense requires a mandatory legislative penalty, with no judicial discretion as to its imposition following verdict.” .
  • State v. Malvo 357 So. 2d 1084 La. 1978
  • State v. Abram 353 So. 2d 1019 La. 1977
  • State v. Hodges 349 So. 2d 250 La. 1977
    the majority of this Court agreed that "a charge and argument may be required and permitted, despite Blackwell, when the statutory offense requires a mandatory legislative penalty, with no judicial discretion as to its imposition following verdict."
  • State v. George 346 So. 2d 694 La. 1977
  • State v. Milby 345 So. 2d 18 La. 1977
    a majority of this court agreed that the Blackwell rationale is inapplicable where, upon conviction, the trial judge must impose a mandatory sentence; and that, therefore, the trial court is required, upon request of the defendant, to charge with regard to a mandatory penalty, because then the penalty is in
  • State v. Unzueta 337 So. 2d 1102 La. 1976
    With respect to assignment #3 and the discussion of State v. Blackwell , see my sentiments expressed in dissent in State v. Prater, La., , decided this date.