Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Turner, 337 So. 2d 1090.

29 citing documents.

State v. E.J.M. 119 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Lawrence Akeem Blade La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
we held that an alleged error concerning the sufficiency of the list of responsive verdicts submitted to the jury may not be considered unless an objection is made in the trial court in time for the trial judge to correct the error.
State v. Houston 925 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Morris 917 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
-1092 (La.1976), defendants alleged that the trial judge erred in submitting to the jury only two responsive verdicts for simple robbery, namely, guilty as charged and not guilty.
State v. Michels 726 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Serio 641 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Although defendant recognizes that the jurisprudence holds that an error relating to the failure to object contemporaneously to a defect in the responsive verdicts is not patent error, he argues that the holding of these cases is wrong and that we should follow the dissenting, rather than the majority opinions in the two leading cases on the issue
State v. Loyden 597 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
[Citations deleted.]' See also State v. Turner, La., (1976)."
State v. Lyles 483 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Uniform Rules Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-12.4
State v. Morris 457 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Williams 449 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
See Rule 2-12.4, Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal; (La.App.
State v. Barber 445 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Ruiz 437 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Trahan 425 So. 2d 1222 La. 1983
State v. Krolowitz 407 So. 2d 1175 La. 1981
State v. Comeaux 408 So. 2d 1099 La. 1981
State v. Liner 397 So. 2d 506 La. 1981
State v. Dowling 387 So. 2d 1165 La. 1980
State v. Thibodeaux 380 So. 2d 59 La. 1980
we held that an alleged error concerning the sufficiency of the list of responsive verdicts submitted to the jury may not be considered unless an objection is made in the trial court in time for the trial judge to correct the error.
State v. Procell 365 So. 2d 484 La. 1978
State v. Weinberg 364 So. 2d 964 La. 1978
See also, State v. Anderson, supra
State v. Murray 357 So. 2d 1121 La. 1978
State v. Turner, La., (1976); State v. Gordon, La., (1976); State v. Malmay, La., (1975); State v. James, La., (1974).
State v. Anderson 357 So. 2d 547 La. 1978
State v. Gilbert, La., (1978); State v. Turner, La., (1976).
State v. Loehr 355 So. 2d 925 La. 1978
State v. Segers 355 So. 2d 238 La. 1978
State v. Gilbert 354 So. 2d 508 La. 1978
However, we held that an admission against penal interest made by the possessor of property to an informant indicates credibility.
State v. Thompson 354 So. 2d 513 La. 1978
[Citations deleted.]" See also State v. Turner, La., (1976).
State v. Ballansaw 350 So. 2d 146 La. 1977
2075 , 29 L.Ed.2d 723 (1971)
State v. Palmer 344 So. 2d 964 La. 1977
State v. Culotta 343 So. 2d 977 La. 1977
State v. Turner, La., (Rendered June 21, 1976); United States v. Harris, 403 U.S. 573 , 91 S.Ct.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by