Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Burnette, 337 So. 2d 1096.
-
State v. Grant
105 So. 3d 81
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
(“An objection stating no basis presents nothing for this court to review.”); (same).
-
State v. Givens
776 So. 2d 443
La. 2001
See, e.g., Jones, 707 So.2d at 978 (holding that indigent defendant has no statutory right to having two attorneys in capital case); (finding trial court did not err by denying motion for continuance because of co-counsel's absence when defendant was represented by another experienced attorney); State v. Sinclair, 258 La.
-
State v. Richards
750 So. 2d 940
La. 1999
("An objection stating no basis presents nothing for this court to review."); (same).
- State v. Hall 606 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
- State v. Williams 605 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- State v. Mitchell 606 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-
State v. McKnight
539 So. 2d 952
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
672 , (1971), overruled on other grounds (La.
- State v. Gray 526 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
- State v. Sampson 480 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- State v. Wingo 457 So. 2d 1159 La. 1984
- State v. Broadway 440 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- State v. Parrish 434 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- State v. Lee 395 So. 2d 700 La. 1981
- State v. Rochon 393 So. 2d 1224 La. 1981
-
State v. Jones
368 So. 2d 1023
La. 1979
we found no error in the trial court’s refusing to follow this procedure when a mid-trial motion questioning mental capacity was made.
-
State in Interest of Causey
363 So. 2d 472
La. 1978
State v. Burnette, La., (1976); State v. Nix, La., (1976).
- State v. Sandifer 359 So. 2d 990 La. 1978
- State v. Cass 356 So. 2d 936 La. 1977
- State v. Dupar 353 So. 2d 272 La. 1977
- State v. Lewis 353 So. 2d 703 La. 1977
- State v. Barrow 352 So. 2d 635 La. 1977
-
State v. Hodges
349 So. 2d 250
La. 1977
See State v. Burnette, La., (1976).
-
State v. Passman
345 So. 2d 874
La. 1977
This Court, applying these principles, rejected precisely the same argument raised by Passman's co-participant, Walter Burnette, in the course of his appeal, -99 (La.1976), and it is not insignificant that Burnette's trial took place several months before Passman'scloser in point of time to the date of the offense, and presumably while the community's initial sense of outrage over the crime was more intense than it was at the time of Passman's trial.
- State v. Johnson 343 So. 2d 155 La. 1977