Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Welch, 337 So. 2d 1114.

17 citing documents.

  • State v. Garner 621 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    722 , 58 L.Ed.2d 706 (1978)
  • State v. Watkins 526 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Burge 493 So. 2d 1204 La. 1986
    This court, recognized this elevation of the Miranda warning to constitutional status.
  • State v. Beck 445 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Smith 431 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)
  • State v. West 408 So. 2d 1114 La. 1982
  • State v. Lindsey 404 So. 2d 466 La. 1981
    15:451; Miranda v. Arizona, supra; see also United States v. Wertz, 625 F.2d 1128, n. 7 (4th Cir. 1980), cert.
  • State v. Coleman 395 So. 2d 704 La. 1981
  • State v. Huff 392 So. 2d 1046 La. 1980
    Defendant was a major at the time of the arrest and, he was not mentally handicapped or otherwise in need of guidance.
  • State v. Napier 385 So. 2d 776 La. 1980
  • State v. Menne 380 So. 2d 14 La. 1980
    State in the Interest of Dino, State of Louisiana Constitutional Convention of 1973 Verbatim Transcripts, September 7, 1973, Vol.
  • State v. Tague 381 So. 2d 507 La. 1980
  • State v. Collins 370 So. 2d 533 La. 1979
    1602 , 16 *539 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); State in Interest of Dino
  • State v. Schmidt 359 So. 2d 133 La. 1978
  • State in Interest of Dino 359 So. 2d 586 La. 1978
  • State v. Williams 346 So. 2d 181 La. 1977
  • State v. Young 344 So. 2d 983 La. 1977
    Further, that "When a defendant urges suppression of an inculpatory statement given subsequent to a prior inculpatory statement that is inadmissible because it is not free and voluntary or because the Miranda directives were not followed in conducting interrogation leading to the initial confession, the proper inqui