Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Welch, 337 So. 2d 1114.
-
State v. Garner
621 So. 2d 1203
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
722 , 58 L.Ed.2d 706 (1978)
- State v. Watkins 526 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
-
State v. Burge
493 So. 2d 1204
La. 1986
This court, recognized this elevation of the Miranda warning to constitutional status.
- State v. Beck 445 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
-
State v. Smith
431 So. 2d 111
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)
- State v. West 408 So. 2d 1114 La. 1982
-
State v. Lindsey
404 So. 2d 466
La. 1981
15:451; Miranda v. Arizona, supra; see also United States v. Wertz, 625 F.2d 1128, n. 7 (4th Cir. 1980), cert.
- State v. Coleman 395 So. 2d 704 La. 1981
-
State v. Huff
392 So. 2d 1046
La. 1980
Defendant was a major at the time of the arrest and, he was not mentally handicapped or otherwise in need of guidance.
- State v. Napier 385 So. 2d 776 La. 1980
-
State v. Menne
380 So. 2d 14
La. 1980
State in the Interest of Dino, State of Louisiana Constitutional Convention of 1973 Verbatim Transcripts, September 7, 1973, Vol.
- State v. Tague 381 So. 2d 507 La. 1980
-
State v. Collins
370 So. 2d 533
La. 1979
1602 , 16 *539 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); State in Interest of Dino
- State v. Schmidt 359 So. 2d 133 La. 1978
- State in Interest of Dino 359 So. 2d 586 La. 1978
- State v. Williams 346 So. 2d 181 La. 1977
-
State v. Young
344 So. 2d 983
La. 1977
Further, that "When a defendant urges suppression of an inculpatory statement given subsequent to a prior inculpatory statement that is inadmissible because it is not free and voluntary or because the Miranda directives were not followed in conducting interrogation leading to the initial confession, the proper inqui