Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. McCarroll, 337 So. 2d 475.

114 citing documents.

State v. Brual 726 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Jackson, 95-423 (La.App.
State v. Antoine 721 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Stoltz 717 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Jackson, 95-423 (La.App.
State v. Mandigo 702 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
art. 780; State v. Muller, supra
State v. Jackson 665 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
State v. Houston 648 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Hornung 620 So. 2d 816 La. 1993
The court then went on to find that the total potential punishment for the consolidated offenses exceeded six months imprisonment, (La.
State v. Morris 607 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
the court stated: Although the right to a jury trial may be waived in a non-capital case, Art. I Section 17 requires that the waiver be "knowingly and intelligently" made.
State Ex Rel. Mims v. Butler 601 So. 2d 649 La. 1992
State v. Ritchie 590 So. 2d 1139 La. 1991
State v. James 576 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Sanders 567 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
4 Cir.1989), writ denied 548 So.2d *179 323
State v. Page 541 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Burton 540 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Adams 525 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Ellis 525 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State v. Drury 506 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Dickson 505 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
This case differs from those where the right to a jury trial is triggered by consolidation of misdemeanor offenses which expose the defendant to potential punishment (incarceration) in excess of six months, (La.
State v. Reed 499 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
wherein McCarroll entered a restaurant, brandished a weapon and warned that anyone who moved would be killed.
State v. Verdin 496 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Mesman 488 So. 2d 1296 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Gillespie 486 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Davis 485 So. 2d 981 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Bouche 485 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Lejeune 487 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
the Supreme Court concluded that multiple charges of aggravated assault arising from the same occurrence did not constitute double jeopardy.
State v. Tucker 482 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Street 480 So. 2d 309 La. 1985
State v. Boasso 478 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
However, our Supreme Court ruled that where two or more charges are joined for trial the right to a jury must be determined by the total punishment that may be imposed in that case.
State v. Eppinette 478 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
2687 , 41 L.Ed.2d 912 (1974)
State v. Smith 475 So. 2d 331 La. 1985
see also Whalen v. United States, 445 U.S. 684, 691-92 , 100 S.Ct.
State v. Goza 467 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Landry 463 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Jones 461 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Sonnier 461 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Hynes 458 So. 2d 1303 La. 1984
State v. Odell 458 So. 2d 1304 La. 1984
State v. Johnson 458 So. 2d 1301 La. 1984
State v. Vieto 453 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
The Louisiana Supreme Court determined Codispoti, supra, and the Louisiana Constitution, Article 1, Section 17, quoted supra, to require a "where two or more charges are joined for trial the right to a jury must be determined by the total punishment which may be imposed in that case."
State v. Bissett 451 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Boult 440 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Trosclair 443 So. 2d 1098 La. 1983
State v. Laurendine 439 So. 2d 398 La. 1983
Const., art. 1, § 17; State v. Williams, supra
State v. Suggs 432 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Davis 427 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. McClendon 420 So. 2d 1135 La. 1982
Because the trial judge did not advise defendant of his right to trial by jury, the plea must be set aside as not knowingly entered.
State v. Comeaux 408 So. 2d 1099 La. 1981
State v. Williams 404 So. 2d 954 La. 1981
State v. Sims 401 So. 2d 1196 La. 1981
State v. Jones 396 So. 2d 1272 La. 1981
State v. Grimble 397 So. 2d 1254 La. 1980
The question of an accused's right to jury trial in cases where the maximum aggregate *1256