DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lee, 340 So. 2d 180.

92 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Darryl Tate La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
  • State v. Robertson 243 So. 3d 1196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    1976) ; State v.Lee , (La.
  • State v. GRH 10 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    In Fraise , the supreme court stated the following: we have held that, because the legislature obviously intended to impose the most serious penalty available under law for the crime of aggravated rape, the appropriate penalty since the invalidation of the mandatory death penalty is the most serious penalty for a
  • State of Louisiana v. G. R. H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    In Fraise, the supreme court stated the following: we have held that, because the legislature obviously intended to impose the most serious penalty available under law for the crime of aggravated rape, the appropriate penalty since the invalidation of the mandatory death penalty is the mo
  • State of Louisiana v. D. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    should be reduced to a sentence of twenty years at hard labor in 23 which addressed a conviction for aggravated rape that occurred in 1974.
  • State v. D.T. 998 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    should be reduced to a sentence of twenty years at hard labor in [^ which addressed a conviction for aggravated rape that occurred in 1974.
  • State v. DT 998 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    should be reduced to a which addressed a conviction for aggravated rape that occurred in 1974.
  • State v. Green 957 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Washington 900 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Washington 900 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    at 1710-11 ; (motion to quash is the appropriate vehicle for challenging the validity of a grand jury indictment, composition, or selection process); (failure to file a motion to quash before trial waives any challenge to the grand jury); State v. White, 193 La.
  • State v. Greco 862 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    at 1710-11 ; (motion to quash is the appropriate vehicle for challenging the validity of a grand jury indictment, composition, or selection process); (failure to file a motion to quash before trial waives any challenge to the grand jury); State v. White, 193 La.
  • State v. Matthews 859 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Bradford 846 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    at 1710-11 ; (motion to quash is the appropriate vehicle for challenging the validity of a grand jury indictment, composition, or selection process); (failure to file a motion to quash before trial waives any challenge to the grand jury); State v. White, 193 La.
  • Robertson v. CADDO PARISH, LA. 833 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Deloch v. Whitley, 96-1901 (La.11/22/96), ; State v. White, 193 La.
  • McCoy v. City of Monroe 747 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • Deloch v. Whitley 684 So. 2d 349 La. 1996
    at 1710-11 ; (motion to quash is the appropriate vehicle for challenging the validity of a grand jury indictment, composition, or selection process); (failure to file a motion to quash before trial waives any challenge to the grand jury); State v. White, 193 La.
  • State v. Martin 645 So. 2d 190 La. 1994
  • State v. Kelly 576 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Collier 522 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Burge 515 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Lowe 485 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Doolittle 482 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Fuselier 474 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Lombard 471 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    in which the Supreme Court of Louisiana, quoting from State v. Jackson, 227 La.
  • State v. Guillot 470 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    State v. Dorsey, 262 La.
  • State v. Lee 469 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Hall 454 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Taylor 448 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Stovall 439 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Johnson 429 So. 2d 870 La. 1983
  • State v. Tribbet 415 So. 2d 182 La. 1982
  • State v. Chapman 410 So. 2d 689 La. 1982
  • State v. Williams 410 So. 2d 217 La. 1982
  • State v. Morris 404 So. 2d 1186 La. 1981
    art. 774, comment (c); (La.
  • State v. Prestridge 399 So. 2d 564 La. 1981
  • State v. McClinton 399 So. 2d 178 La. 1981
  • State v. Coleman 395 So. 2d 704 La. 1981
  • State v. Sayles 395 So. 2d 695 La. 1981
    State v. Jackson, 227 La.
  • State v. Toomer 395 So. 2d 1320 La. 1981
    State v. Dorsey, 262 La.
  • State v. Berry 391 So. 2d 406 La. 1980
    This Court has in several cases opined that arguments which appeal to emotions and fears of jury members are improper: where the state attempted to turn jury deliberations into a plebiscite on crime and criminals and predicted dire consequences to society as a whole if leniency were to be shown; (La.
  • State v. Williams 373 So. 2d 1278 La. 1979
  • State v. Williams 375 So. 2d 364 La. 1979
    774, Official Revision Comment (c)
  • State v. Heads 370 So. 2d 564 La. 1979
  • State v. Billiot 370 So. 2d 539 La. 1979
  • State v. Valentine 364 So. 2d 595 La. 1978
    State v. Burge, La., (1978) (rehearing denied October 19, 1978); State v. Drew, La., (1978); State v. Bryant, La., *597 (1977); State v. Lee, La., (1976); State v. Craig, La., (1976); State v. Sledge, La., (1976).
  • State v. Jones 363 So. 2d 714 La. 1978
  • State v. Swift 363 So. 2d 499 La. 1978
  • State v. Carter 363 So. 2d 893 La. 1978
    State v. Lee, La., (1976); State v. Chaffin, La., (1975); State v. Dennis, 250 La.
  • State v. Burge 362 So. 2d 1371 La. 1978
    State v. Craig, La., (1976); State v. Lee, La., (1976); State v. Sledge, La., (1976).
  • State v. Gwinn 361 So. 2d 1207 La. 1978