DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Broussard v. Broussard, 340 So. 2d 1309.

37 citing documents.

  • Succession of Ronnie Mack Goodman La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
    Thus, shares of closely held corporations are Article 8 securities.” Regarding donative intent and the Civil Code’s substantive requirements for a donation, (La.
  • Succession of Mary Agnes Clark La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    It has long been held that “[a]n account on deposit is an incorporeal right.” La.Civ.Code art. 473; While Mr. Clark made a similar argument to the trial court, the trial court did not appear to address it, given its conclusions that Mississippi and/or Minnesota law applied and the HW account was a “joint tenancy” account.
  • Succession of Love 201 So. 3d 1027 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3 It has long been held that “[a]n account on deposit is an incorporeal right.” La.Civ.Code art. 473; 4
  • Succession of James Oliver Love La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    ter vivos of a corporeal movable can be accomplished by manual delivery, pursuant to La.Civ.Code art. 1543,2 while the donation of an incorporeal movable requires an authentic act, unless the law provides otherwise, pursuant to La.Civ.Code art. 1541.3 It has long been held that “[a]n account on deposit is an incorporeal right.” La.Civ.Code art. 473; 4
  • Succession of Cecil Vanderbilt Gassiott La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    in which a husband purchased savings certificates in he and his wife’s names with funds received from a settlement.
  • Succession of Gassiott 159 So. 3d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    in which a husband purchased savings certificates in he and his wife’s names with funds received from a settlement.
  • Champagne v. Champagne 992 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    -13 (La.1976); Succession of Payne, 459 So.2d at 1233 .
  • Succession of Ray Joseph Comeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    the supreme court 2 held that the purchase of CDs in the name of a husband and his wife did not effect a manual gift to the wife because there was no actual withdrawal or delivery of the funds.
  • Louise Gaspard v. Iberia Bank La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    the supreme court held that the purchase of CDs in the name of a husband and his wife did not effect a manual gift to the wife because there was no actual withdrawal or delivery of the funds.
  • Gaspard v. Iberia Bank 953 So. 2d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    the supreme court held that the purchase of CDs in the name of a husband and his wife did not effect a manual gift to the wife because there was no actual withdrawal or delivery of the funds.
  • Hartnett v. LGD Properties, Inc. 767 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • Kanz v. Wilson 703 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • Richard v. Richard 653 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • McMorris v. McMorris 654 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • In Re Succession of Caraway 639 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • Roge v. Roge 604 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • Sepulvado v. Sepulvado 590 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • Miller v. Lake Arthur Reclamation Co. 558 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
  • Dance v. Dance 552 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    quoting 3 M. Planiol, Treatise on the Civil Law (La.St.L.Inst.
  • Young v. Young 549 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    a case very similar to the present one, our Supreme Court held that a husband's recovery, during marriage, of personal injury damages, which resulted from a premarital accident, was the husband's separate property, though a portion of the funds recovered included compensation for loss of future earnings.
  • Carter v. Carter 538 So. 2d 1121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • Succession of Daroca 536 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    the Supreme Court held that the purchase of certificates of deposit in the name of a husband and his wife did not effect a manual gift to the wife because there was no actual withdrawal or delivery of the funds, and that the account itself was an incorporeal movable and thus required an authentic act.
  • Succession of Fralick v. Secretary of the Department of Revenue & Taxation 529 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • Succession of Hemelt 523 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • Blue v. Coastal Club, Inc. 524 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • Succession of Goudeau 480 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • Succession of Velasquez-Bain 471 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    (Rehearing Denied—1977) This case as other cases decided by our highest appellate courts have held substance to be inviolate, while permitting the sanctity of form to be diminished.
  • Mead v. Mead 442 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • Whatley v. Whatley 439 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    dealing with workers' compensation benefits, dealing with interest on savings certificates, both involving payments made after dissolution of the community.
  • Succession of Amos 422 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    is controlling on this point.
  • Bergeron v. Bergeron 411 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    Moreover, in spite of the holding in the Allen case, this court is bound by its previous decisions in cases of this sort, which we see no reason to overrule
  • Matter of Succession of Dunham 408 So. 2d 888 La. 1981
  • Succession of Miller 378 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    the Court explained that as long as monies remained in a joint account, there could be no automatic transfer of ownership.
  • Vincent v. Lemaire 370 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
  • Burkes v. Barbour 364 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
  • Succession of Palermo 359 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
  • Succession of Smith 359 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978