Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lucas v. Ins. Co. of North America, 342 So. 2d 591.

213 citing documents.

Tammy Lewis Personally and Obo Jayson Lewis and Jaylon Lewis v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., Cox Communications, … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Distinguished Jacob Kibodeaux v. Jan's Construction Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Co. of N. Am., the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “[a] claimant’s disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident, if before the accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously manifest themselves afterwar
Cindy Aych Versus State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Alfortish Enterprises, L.L.C. and Madison Randon La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Alisa Alan Durkheimer v. Tranise L. Landry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Krishnendu Dey v. Eddie Williams and Lyndon Southern Insurance Company and First Chicago Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Patricia Matthews v. Big Easy Janitorial, L.L.C., and Louisiana Construction and Industry Self Insurers Fund La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Co. of North America, ).
Kayla Landry v. State Farm Automobile Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Joseph Davis v. Christie Wheeler and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
Elaine Lazard v. Progressive Paloverde Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Ms. Lazard argues that the following presumption for proving causation set forth in Housely, 579 So.2d at 980 ( applies to her claim for BPPV damages and that the trial court erred in refusing to apply the presumption: “[a] claimant’s disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident, if before the accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with
McNeil v. Trosclair 265 So. 3d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Co. of N. America , , 596 (La.
Earl McCarthy, Sr. v. City of Opelousas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
to support this presumption.
James Crawford Bailey v. Veolia Environmental Services La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
5 A “demand for work[ers’] compensation is required to be in no particular form, as long as it informs the insurer that the insured asserts a claim for compensation under the policy.”
Bailey v. Veolia Envtl. Servs. 237 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Lucas v. Insurance Co. of North America , , 598 (La.1977).
Marie v. Allstate Insurance Co. 224 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Johnnell Duncan v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Co. of North America, ).
Duncan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 213 So. 3d 1297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Co. of North America, (La.
Herbert Marshall v. Courville Toyota La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Marshall v. Courvelle Toyota 175 So. 3d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Hayward v. Boh Bros. Construction Co. 169 So. 3d 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
an accident, if before the accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously manifest themselves afterwards, providing that the medical evidence shows there to be a reasonable possibility of causal connection between the accident and the disabling condition.”
Lawrence v. Government Employees Insurance Co. 151 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Reddoch v. Parish of Plaquemines 134 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Thibodeaux v. Ace American Insurance Co. 127 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
(quoting Lucas v. Insurance Co. of North, America, (La.
Danielle Brooke Thibodeaux v. Ace American Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
(), the supreme court determined: [a] claimant‟s disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident, if before the accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously manifes
Garcia v. City of New Orleans 115 So. 3d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Salazar v. Command Construction, LLC 117 So. 3d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously manifest themselves afterwards, providing that the medical evidence shows there to be a reasonable possibility of causal connection between the accident and the disabling condition.” West, 371 So.2d at 1149
Billy Wayne Broadway v. Shane Mitchell Logging, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Broadway v. Shane Mitchell Logging, Inc. 105 So. 3d 1041 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
D'Angelo v. Guarino 88 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Kellianne Kelly-Williams,indiv., Etc. v. At&t Mobility, LLC . La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Kelly-Williams v. AT & T Mobility, LLC 90 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Gober v. Walgreen Louisiana Co. 80 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Smith v. Transport Services Co. 67 So. 3d 487 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
3 In Housley , the Supreme Court stated: this Court stated: [a] claimant’s disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident, if before the accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously manifest themselves after-wards, providing that the medic
Virginia Peoples, Et Ux. v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
25 (alteration in original), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: [a] claimant’s disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident, if before the accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously manifest thems
Peoples v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc. 38 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
(alteration in original), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: [a] claimant’s disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident, if before the accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously manifest themselves afterwards, providin
Kelly v. AME JANITORIAL SERVICES CO. 33 So. 3d 358 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
James Jason, III v. Louisiana Municipal Risk Management Agency La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Co. of N.A., (citations omitted)).
Jason v. Louisiana Municipal Risk Management Agency 27 So. 3d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co. of N. A., (citations omitted)).
Harrell v. St. Margaret's Daughter's Nursing Home 24 So. 3d 941 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co. of N. America, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the principle of presumption as to causal connection between accident and injury as follows: A claimant’s disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident the injured was in good health, but commencing with the accident, the symptoms of the disabling condition
Batiste v. INTERSTATE HOTELS & RESORTS 23 So. 3d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
LaFleur v. M. Langenstein & Sons, Inc. 16 So. 3d 1178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
23:1031 states that, as a threshold requirement, a worker in a compensation action must establish “personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course and scope of his employment.” stated the principle of presumption as to causal connection between accident and injury as follows: A claimant’s disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident the injured was in good health, but commencing with the accident, the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously manifest
Shannon Menard v. Lafayette Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
However, at page 980 of its opinion, (citations omitted), wherein it stated: A claimant’s disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident, if before the accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously man
Menard v. Lafayette Insurance 13 So. 3d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The supreme court recognized in Housley that a plaintiff bears the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, a causal relationship between the injury sustained and the accident that caused the injury.- However, at page 980 of its opinion, (citations omitted), wherein it stated: A claimant’s disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident, if before the accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident the symptoms of the disabling condition ap
Boxie v. Smith-Ruffin 979 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Venissat v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 968 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Theodore Venissat v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Littleton v. Richardson Medical Center 954 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
the supreme court stated: [a] claimant’s disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident, if before the accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously manifest themselves afterwards, providing that the
Detraz v. Lee 950 So. 2d 557 La. 2007
Co. of N. Am., , to this case.
Jordan v. Vice 943 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
The Louisiana Supreme Court in Housley, 579 So.2d at 980, : A claimant's disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident, if before the accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously manifest themselves afterwards, providing that the medical evidence shows
Robert C. Jordan v. Zoie R. Vice La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
The Louisiana Supreme Court in Housley, 579 So.2d at 980, : A claimant’s disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident, if before the accident the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously manifest themselves afterwards
Yuronda Jackson v. St. Francis Cabrini Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
on was in good health, but commencing with the accident the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously manifest themselves afterwards, providing that the medical evidence shows there to be a reasonable possibility of causal connection 8 between the accident and the disabling condition.’ ” West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., (citation omitted).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by