Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Gallow, 338 So. 2d 920.

39 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Markus O. Andrews La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
the defendant argued that the trial court committed legal error by commenting on the facts of the case and expressing an opinion on his guilt or innocence during voir dire.
State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
108 photographs; its ruling will not be disturbed in the absence of an abuse of that discretion.” (La.
State v. Leger 236 So. 3d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Donte Reed 200 So. 3d 291 La. 2016
State v. Harrison 147 So. 3d 161 La. 2014
| .This court has long held that “[t]he test of admissibility is whether the probative value of the photographs outweighs the prejudice which may result from their display to the jury.” ( (1976); (1975)).
State of Louisiana v. Vaschon S. Blount La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Aaron 57 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Ramirez 30 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Addison, 08-461, p. 16 (La.App.
State v. Addison 8 So. 3d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
“The trial court has considerable discretion in the admission of photographs [and] its ruling will not be disturbed in the absence of an abuse of that discretion.”
Brenda Mouton v. John C. Lemaire La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Mouton v. LEMAIRE 970 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Matthis 970 So. 2d 505 La. 2007
at 840-41 ; (trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting jurors to view scene of the murder because "there were several people involved in the shooting incident which resulted in the victim's death.
State v. Norman 756 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Hardy 711 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Satterly v. Louisiana Indem. Co. 704 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Pooler 696 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Phillips 670 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Harvey 649 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Rudd v. Atlas Processing Refinery 644 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Weidert 568 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Lee 559 So. 2d 1310 La. 1990
State v. Boudreaux 526 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
The fact that photographs are in color does not in itself make them inadmissible, even despite the fact that duplicate black and white pictures may be available.
State v. Hamilton 481 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Johnson 453 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Turner 440 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Simpson, 247 La.
State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1091 La. 1983
State v. Simpson, 247 La.
State v. Shapiro 431 So. 2d 372 La. 1983
State v. Moore 432 So. 2d 209 La. 1983
1970 , 72 L.Ed.2d 440 (1982); cert.
State v. Moore 419 So. 2d 963 La. 1982
State v. Johnson 404 So. 2d 239 La. 1981
State v. Echols 376 So. 2d 1244 La. 1979
State v. Burch 365 So. 2d 1263 La. 1979
State v. Weems, La., (1978); State v. Winston, La., (1977); State v. Gallow, La., (1976).
State v. Boyd 359 So. 2d 931 La. 1978
State v. Weems 358 So. 2d 285 La. 1978
State v. Winston, La., (1977); State v. Gallow, La., (1976).
State v. Lindsey 351 So. 2d 1178 La. 1977
State v. Winston, La., (1977); State v. Gallow, La., (1976).
State v. Hawthorne 345 So. 2d 1170 La. 1977
1976) (bloody clothes); (photographs); (photographs); ("needle tracks" in defendant's arms); (La.
State v. Johnson 343 So. 2d 155 La. 1977