Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Curtis, 338 So. 2d 662.

87 citing documents.

  • State v. Green 245 So. 3d 1105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
  • State v. Flores 167 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Wayne Montgomery La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Castillo 167 So. 3d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    -65 (La.1976); State v. Dugas, 170 La.
  • State v. Watkins 146 So. 3d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Martin 141 So. 3d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. White 130 So. 3d 298 La. 2013
    Payton , 00-2899 at p. 8, 810 So.2d at 1132
  • State v. Hackett 122 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Brown 82 So. 3d 1232 La. 2012
  • State v. Besse 83 So. 3d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Lewis 75 So. 3d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Vincent 56 So. 3d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State of Louisiana v. Marcus Quinn, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Quinn 38 So. 3d 1102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Murphy 34 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Henry, 96-1280, p. 7 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Zoran Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    It is well established that various methods may be used to carry this burden of proof, such as “testimony of witnesses, by expert opinion as to the fingerprints of the accused when compared with those in the prison record introduced, or by photographs contained in a duly authenticated record.”
  • State v. Johnson 28 So. 3d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    It is well established that various methods may be used to carry this burden of proof, such as *1270 “testimony of witnesses, by expert opinion as to the fingerprints of the accused when compared with those in the prison record introduced, or by photographs contained in a duly authenticated record.”
  • State of Louisiana v. Broadus Darneal Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    See, e.g., State v. Westbrook, [ ]
  • State v. Davis 19 So. 3d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    See, e.g., State v. Westbrook, [ ]
  • State v. Senegal 972 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Desmond Joseph Senegal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Neathery 973 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State v. Gray 948 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    1754 , 100 L.Ed.2d 216 (1988); State v. King, supra , citing State v. White, 28, 095 (La.App.2d Cir.5/8/96), , writ denied, 96-1459 (La.11/15/96), , and 98-0282 (La.6/26/98), ; State v. Young, 27,237 (La.
  • State v. Mays 929 So. 2d 1231 La. 2006
  • State v. Robertson 925 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    ” Nicholas, 359 So.2d at 968 .
  • State v. Watson 911 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Hight, 35,621 (La.App.
  • State v. Callier 909 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Regarding proof that the defendant is the same person as the previously convicted felon, provides: Identification of the accused may be by testimony of witnesses, by expert opinion as to the fingerprints of the accused when compared with those in the prison record introduced, or by photographs contained in the duly authenticated record.
  • State v. Washington 895 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State of Louisiana v. Carey Louis Hood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    See, e.g., State v. Westbrook, []
  • State v. Hood 895 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    See, e.g., State v. Westbrook, [ ]
  • State v. Lowery 890 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    established that evidence is insufficient to adjudge the defendant as a multiple offender when the only link between the defendant and the person who committed the prior felonies is identical names.
  • State v. Blackson 865 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Thomas, 27,504 (La.App.2d Cir.11/1/95), ; State v. Morris, 99-3075 (La.App.
  • State v. Gillam 850 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Holloway 847 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Jackson, supra .
  • State v. Payton 810 So. 2d 1127 La. 2002
    See, e.g., State v. *1131 Westbrook, supra
  • State v. Hight 810 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Wallace 788 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Robinson 780 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Powell 779 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Johnson 780 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Lindsey 770 So. 2d 339 La. 2000
  • State v. Everett 770 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Bass 767 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Brown 773 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Hayden 767 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Lee 764 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Anderson 753 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Williams 729 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    State v. Neville, 96-0137 (La.App.
  • State v. Jackson 726 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Inzina 728 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998