DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Wiggins, 337 So. 2d 1172.

18 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Isaiah Doyle La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
    State v. Shank, supra; (La.
  • State v. Ross 207 So. 3d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Nickles 60 So. 3d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Austin, 258 La.
  • State of Louisiana v. James Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    this Court stated: -9- “The defendant had no right, as here claimed, to make surrebuttal argument to the state’s closing rebuttal argument.
  • State v. Jones 45 So. 3d 1136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    this Court stated: [ m“The defendant had no right, as here claimed, to make surrebuttal argument to the state’s closing rebuttal argument.
  • State v. Smith 7 So. 3d 855 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
    "[a] defendant cannot complain that prejudicial conduct requires a mistrial, when the alleged prejudice was created by his own obstructive conduct met by a reasoned and ordered reaction by the trial court in the interest of maintaining orderly procedure in the courtroom."
  • State v. DeGrate 634 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Lucas 482 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Shank 448 So. 2d 654 La. 1984
    at 1173 (La.1976), Justice Tate, speaking for the Court stated: The motions for mistrial were properly denied.
  • State v. Felde 422 So. 2d 370 La. 1982
  • State v. Tauzier 397 So. 2d 494 La. 1981
    1977); State v. Austin, 258 La.
  • State v. Gould 395 So. 2d 647 La. 1981
  • State v. Rochon 393 So. 2d 1224 La. 1981
  • City of Baton Rouge v. Dees 363 So. 2d 530 La. 1978
    State v. Hedgwood, 345 So,2d 1179 (La.1977)
  • State v. Leggett 363 So. 2d 434 La. 1978
    State v. Austin, 258 La.
  • State v. Williams 358 So. 2d 943 La. 1978
    this Court stated: "The defendant had no right, as here claimed, to make surrebuttal argument to the state's closing rebuttal argument.
  • State ex rel. Wiggins v. Lombard 349 So. 2d 326 La. 1977
    The applicant’s attorney has already received a transcript for purposes of appellate review, see our docket No. 57,951 ( ), affirming the conviction, and no showing is made of its need for any other purpose.