DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Marks, 337 So. 2d 1177.

143 citing documents.

  • State v. Otkins-Victor 193 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Victor 195 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State of Louisiana Versus Errol Victor, Sr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
  • State v. Scott 97 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. George Earl White, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    223, 225, 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964); State v. Scales, 93-2003, p. 6 (La.5/22/95), La.Code Crim.
  • State v. Johnson 993 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    ” State v. Marley, 2006-0317, p. 6, n. 4 (La.App.
  • State v. Duplessis 974 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Hunter 949 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    [P]olice officers may make warrantless arrests if probable cause exists, that is, “when the facts and circumstances known to the arresting officer and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient to justify a man of ordinary caution in believing that the person to be arrested has committed a crime.” State v. Cojoe, 01-2465 (La.10/25/02), ; (citing Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89, 90 , 85 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Eric L. Hunter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    less arrests if probable cause exists, that is, “when the facts and circumstances known to the arresting officer and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient to justify a man of ordinary caution in believing that the person to be arrested has committed a crime.” State v. Cojoe, 01-2465 (La.10/25/02), (citing Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89, 90, 85 S.Ct.
  • State v. Marley 945 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Kelley 934 So. 2d 51 La. 2006
    223, 225 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964); State v. Scales, 93-2003, p. 6 (La.5/22/95)
  • State v. Slaydon 921 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    223, 225 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964); State v. Scales, 93-2003, p. 6 (La.5/22/95), ; La.Code Crim.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jason L. Slaydon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    223, 225, 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964); State v. Scales, 93-2003, p. 6 (La.5/22/95), La.Code Crim.
  • State of Louisiana v. Damian S. Burgess La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    As a general matter, police officers may make warrantless arrests if probable cause exists, that is, “when the facts and circumstances known to the arresting officer and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient to justify a man of ordinary caution in believing that the person to be arrested has committed a crime.” (citing Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89, 90, 85 S.Ct.
  • State v. Burgess 876 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    (citing Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89, 90 , 85 S.Ct.
  • State v. Temple 854 So. 2d 856 La. 2003
    State v. Cojoe, 01-2465 (La.10/25/02), ; (La.
  • State v. Cojoe 828 So. 2d 1101 La. 2002
    (citing Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89, 90 , 85 S.Ct.
  • State v. Broussard 819 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    n. 1 (La.1976); (La.App.
  • State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    n. 1 (La.1976); (La.App.
  • State v. Flowers 782 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    n. 1 (La.1976); (La.App.
  • State v. Furgerson 781 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Richardson 779 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
    716 , 133 L.Ed.2d 670 (1996); La.Code.Crim.
  • State v. Anthony 776 So. 2d 376 La. 2000
    223, 225 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964); State v. Scales, 93-2003, p. 6 (La.5/22/95), ; La.Code Crim.
  • State v. Hill 725 So. 2d 1282 La. 1998
  • State v. Alexander 632 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Simms 554 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    223 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964)
  • State v. Tyler 548 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Bailey 545 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Nelson 543 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    State v. Tomasetti, supra
  • State v. Dennis 540 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. LaBranch 541 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Hargrove 535 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    223 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964)
  • State v. Sanchez 516 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Washington 513 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Merchant 490 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Thorne 487 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Forde 482 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Junegain 478 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Jones 467 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    This assignment is without merit for at least three reasons: first, the defendant did not request that information from the state in his motion for bill of particulars; second, even had he requested the names of the state’s witnesses, he would not have been entitled to them, and third, the state’s bill of particulars, by clear implication actually supplied that information, stating that its case relied in great part on the victim’s testimony.
  • State v. Sanders 463 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    820 , 46 L.Ed.2d 598 (1976).”
  • State v. Raheem 454 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Commodore, 418 So.2d at 1332
  • State v. Stewart 451 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    223 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964)
  • State v. Tasker 448 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Farber 446 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Ruffin 448 So. 2d 1274 La. 1984
    223 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964)
  • State v. Beck 445 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Johnson 443 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
  • State v. Mitchell 443 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    State v. Tomasetti, supra