DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., 339 So. 2d 1212.

29 citing documents.

  • Eddie Bourque, Jr., Et Ux. v. Anco Insulations, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    sert that summary judgment was improper in this case because of “the long line of cases in Louisiana that reject LCS’ proposed rule of exclusivity based upon the vagaries of exactly where a land-based worker is injured on the job,” citing Logan v. Louisiana Dock Co., Inc., Beverly v. Action Marine Serv., Inc., and, Richard v. Lake Charles Stevedores, Inc., (La.App.
  • Bourque v. ANCO INSULATIONS, INC. 25 So. 3d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    assert that summaiy judgment was improper in this case because of “the long line of cases in Louisiana that reject LCS’ proposed rule of exclusivity based upon the vagaries of exactly where a land-based worker is injured on the job,” citing Logan v. Louisiana Dock Co., Inc., Beverly v. Action Marine Serv., Inc., and, Richard v. Lake Charles Stevedores, Inc., (La.App.
  • DiBenedetto v. Noble Drilling Co. 23 So. 3d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.
  • Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. 921 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    This conclusion from the United States Supreme Court echoes the earlier decision of the Louisiana Supreme Court in Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., in which the court stated, "[I]t is our opinion that the 1972 amendments to the [LHWCA] were intended to provide additional benefits for land-based maritime workers rather than to deprive them of rights and remedies which they already had."
  • Bourgeois v. GREEN INDUSTRIES 841 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    This Court addressed this issue fully in Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 00-344 at p. 22, 784 So.2d at 67 , in which we stated: We find that the Louisiana Supreme Court case of Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., (La.
  • Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 784 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    Plaintiffs contend, citing Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., that the LHWCA and the State Workers' Compensation scheme exist as concurrent remedies, and that the existence of the LHWCA does not preclude plaintiffs from electing to pursue their remedies under State law.
  • Hurst v. Boland Machine & Manufacturing Co. 713 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., held that when federal and state remedies operated concurrently a plaintiff could use state law even if the relief thereunder exceeded that of federal law.
  • Smith v. Gretna MacH. and Iron Works 646 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    See Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.
  • Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc. 593 So. 2d 634 La. 1992
    1590 , 36 L.Ed.2d 280 (1973); Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.
  • Bourgeois v. Puerto Rican Marine Management, Inc. 589 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., appeal dismissed Territo v. Poche, 434 U.S. 803 , 98 S.Ct.
  • Jackson v. AMERICAN MUT. LIABILITY INS. 584 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    2432 , 65 L.Ed.2d 458 n. 8 (1980); Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., appeal dismissed, Territo v. Poche, 434 U.S. 803 , 98 S.Ct.
  • Griffis v. Gulf Coast Pre-Stress Co., Inc. 563 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    We find no merit to appellant's argument that Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., (La.App.
  • Hildebrand v. City of New Orleans 549 So. 2d 1218 La. 1989
    Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., (La.
  • Logan v. Louisiana Dock Co., Inc. 541 So. 2d 182 La. 1989
    In Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., we permitted third party negligence actions to proceed under Louisiana law despite the availability of a federal remedy under the LHWCA.
  • Crater v. Mesa Offshore Co. 539 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    We are not swayed by the many decisions cited by plaintiff such as Jenkins v. McDermott, Inc., 734 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1984), vacated on other grounds, 742 F.2d 191 (5th Cir.1984), or Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.
  • Roberts v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc. 537 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
  • Logan v. Louisiana Dock Co. 526 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    In Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court did the opposite of what the trial court did in the instant case.
  • Lewis v. Modular Quarters 508 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    This holding is in accord with the decision rendered by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.
  • Chance v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York 509 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    69 (1983); Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., appeal dismissed, 434 U.S. 803 , 98 S.Ct.
  • Allen v. Keeney 442 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., appeal dismissed 434 U.S. 803 , 98 S.Ct.
  • Beverly v. Action Marine Services, Inc. 433 So. 2d 139 La. 1983
    See Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., Garcia , *143 supra.
  • Thompson v. Teledyne Movible Offshore, Inc. 419 So. 2d 822 La. 1982
    The U. S. Supreme Court's conclusion in Sun Ship is the same as that reached earlier by this Court in Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., (1976) in a well-reasoned opinion by Justice Marcus.
  • Valdez v. Equitable Equipment Co. 383 So. 2d 1371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    III In Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., (La.
  • Bearden v. Leon C. Breaux Towing 365 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    2348 , 53 L.Ed.2d 320 (1977); and Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.
  • Edwards v. Hartzman 362 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    In Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the Longshoremen and Harbor Workers Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.
  • Wixom v. Travelers Ins. Co. 357 So. 2d 1343 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
  • Palmer v. Keeney 357 So. 2d 1339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    This issue as well as several other issues raised have been settled by the case of Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, appeal dismissed, Territo v. Poche, 434 U.S. 803 , 98 S.Ct.
  • Parfait v. Deroche 356 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    In Poche v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., rehearing denied, the Louisiana Supreme Court reviewed the United States Supreme Court’s jurisprudence concerning the LHCA.
  • Jenkins v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. 347 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Appellees concede the recent Supreme Court decision in Poche v. Avondale *315 Shipyards, Inc., nullifies their position on the exclusiveness-of-remedy argument.