Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite White v. Rimmer & Garrett, Inc., 340 So. 2d 283.

21 citing documents.

Cajun Conti LLC, Cajun Cuisine 1 LLC, and Cajun Cuisine LLC D/B/A Oceana Grill v. Certain Underwriters at … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
1981) (citing White v. Rimmer & Garrett, Inc., (La.
Geoil, L.L.C. v. Online Resource Exchange, Inc. 838 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
White v. Rim-mer & Garrett, Inc., (La.
Morton M. Goldberg Auction Galleries, Inc. v. Canco, Inc. 650 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
instead of net profits, may be employed to measure tort damages when the business and its normal overhead continues after the damage."); see White v. Rimmer & Garrett, Inc., see also Radiofone, Inc. v. Pricelluar Corp., Civ.A.
Latiolais v. BFI of Louisiana, Inc. 567 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
White v. Rimmer & Garrett, Inc., (La.
Brabham v. Harper 485 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
See White v. Rimmer & Garrett, Inc.
Security National Bank of Shreveport v. Terrell 482 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
See White v. Rimmer & Garrett
Celt Oil, Inc. v. Jackson 469 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
See also *264 White v. Rimmer & Garrett, Inc.
TR Drilling Co., Inc. v. Howard 463 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
White v. Rimmer & Garrett, Inc., Dixie Campers, (La.
SECURITY NAT. BANK OF SHREVEPORT v. Terrell 459 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Following the Louisiana Supreme Court's opinion in White v. Rimmer and Garrett, Inc., the trial court deducted the direct cost of digging and loading the dirt from this figure to determine Terrell's lost profit.
Ed Bulliard Co., Inc. v. FORETICH-ZIMMER CONST. CO. 451 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Magnolia Construction Co., writ denied and White v. Rimmer and Garrett, Inc., (La.
Kuswa & Associates, Inc. v. Thibaut Construction Co. 440 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
More succintly, in White v. Rimmer and Garrett, Inc., the Supreme Court stated: “Lost profit is determined by deducting the cost of labor and materials from the total contract price.” (p. 286).
French Jordan, Inc. v. Oilfield Sales & Serv. 439 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
White v. Rimmer & Garrett, Inc., Magnolia Construction Company, (La.App.
Bank of New Orleans v. HPB, Jr. Development 427 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
On parol evidence, our Supreme court has stated in White v. Rimmer & Garrett, Inc., -86 (La.1976): "Generally parol evidence may not be admitted `against or beyond what is contained in the acts, nor what may have been said before, or at the time of making them, or since.'
Lauman v. Cavaretta's, Inc. 427 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
See Dixie Campers, White v. Dimmer & Garrett, Inc., Texhoma Contractors v. So.
Smith v. Moncrief 421 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
White v. Rimmer & Garret, Inc.
Magnolia Const. Co., Inc. v. Causey 421 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
In White v. Rimmer & Garrett, Inc., the Supreme Court ruled that the damages due a subcontractor for being deprived of his right to perform the contract consist of the profits of which the subcontractor was deprived.
Tauzin v. Claitor 417 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
art. 2276; White v. Rimmer & Garrett, Inc., (La.App.
Campesi v. Margaret Plantation 417 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
art. 2276; White v. Rimmer & Garrett, Inc., (La.
Dixie Campers, Inc. v. Vesely Co. 398 So. 2d 1087 La. 1981
White v. Rimmer & Garrett, Inc., Gulf States Finance Corp. v. Airline Auto Sales, Inc., 248 La.
Calvary Tabernacle v. La. Central Bank 393 So. 2d 708 La. 1981
White v. Rimmer & Garrett, Inc.
White v. Rimmer & Garrett, Inc. 360 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
White v. Rimmer & Garrett, Inc.