DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., 341 So. 2d 332.

1757 citing documents.

  • Cage v. Caruso 611 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Budget Rent-A-Car v. Gradnigo 611 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
  • Jackson v. AL & W. MOORE TRUCKING 609 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    Reck v. Stevens, supra ; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Higginbotham v. Ouachita Parish Police Jury, supra .
  • Mistich v. Pipelines, Inc. 609 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
  • Fuselier v. Amoco Production Co. 607 So. 2d 1044 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • Cradeur v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 607 So. 2d 1050 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Thibodeaux v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc. 608 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Bacle v. Wade 607 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • Bacle v. Wade 607 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • Girard v. Price 606 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    Only after such determination of abuse has been reached, is a resort to prior awards appropriate under Coco [v. Wilson, ] for purposes of then determining what would be an appropriate award for the present case."
  • Dominici v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 606 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
  • Brimer v. Copeland 604 So. 2d 1388 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Garrison v. State, *1391 Through Department of Highways, (La.App.
  • Epps v. City of Baton Rouge 604 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    [4] Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Smith v. Two" R" Drilling Co., Inc. 606 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    1990); Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Martin v. G & a LTD. 604 So. 2d 1014 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Carey v. Thomas 603 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
    Our review of this same evidence shows that the lowest amount the jury could have awarded for this item without abusing its discretion is $3,000, and we therefore award that amount
  • Boudreaux v. Farmer 604 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Estate of Thomas v. STATE, DOTD 604 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    4th Cir.1985), writ denied
  • Price v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 608 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Price v. LOUISIANA DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 608 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Rivet v. LeBlanc 600 So. 2d 1358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • McConnell v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 600 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Suhre v. Jefferson Parish School Board 601 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    See Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Piper v. Gahagon 599 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Sharkey v. Sterling Drug, Inc. 600 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Having found an abuse of discretion in the four million dollar general damages award, we now lower the award to the "highest point which was reasonably within the discretion afforded to the trial court" (See Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La, 1976).
  • Hardy v. Delta Downs, Inc. 599 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Only after such de *368 termination of abuse has been reached, is a resort to prior awards appropriate under Coco [v. Winston Industries, Inc., La.1977) ] for purposes of then determining what would be an appropriate award for the present case.
  • Stoutes v. GMAC 598 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Browning v. Commercial Union Ins.
  • Warren v. Bergeron 599 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (1976) stated that, before an appellate court can disturb a quantum award made by a trial court, the record must clearly show *378 that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making the award.
  • Mackie v. Lalonde 598 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    On the other hand, if the answer is in the negative, then the trial court properly granted the JNOV, and its damage award based on its independent assessment of the damages is the judgment of the trial court which is reviewed on appeal under the constraints of Coco [v. Winston Industries, Inc., ].
  • Starnes v. Caddo Parish School Bd. 598 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Page v. Gilbert 598 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Scamardo v. New Orleans Stevedoring Co. 595 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • Lloyd v. Dixie Lloyds Insurance Co. 595 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Pitre v. Government Employees Ins. Co. 596 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    THE DAMAGE AWARD TO PLAINTIFF In reviewing the other elements of damages awarded, we are guided by the following: "The standard of review for quantum was enunciated by the Supreme Court in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., wherein it stated (at 334): "We do reemphasize, however, that before a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a trial court that the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award.
  • Moore v. Chrysler Corp. 596 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • Jeffries v. Estate of Pruitt 598 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Miley v. La. Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. 599 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
  • Fannin v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 594 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Bourgeois v. Bill Watson's Investments, Inc., (La.App.
  • Glynn v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 597 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
  • Samuels v. Southern Baptist Hosp. 594 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • Anmac Foundation v. St. Patrick Hosp. 594 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Clark v. Ark-La-Tex Auction, Inc. 593 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Ellis v. Dover Elevator Co. 597 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
  • Boulmay v. Dubois 593 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    the appellate court [under the guidelines of Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., ] must award the lowest amount that the jury reasonably could have determined in its discretion."
  • Molaison v. Denny's Inc. 592 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc. Buquoi v. Allstate Ins.
  • Melancon v. Hyatt Corp. 589 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
  • Glasper v. Henry 589 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • Davis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 590 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Thomas v. Petrolane Gas Service Ltd. 588 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    Coco v. Winston Ind., Inc., (La.
  • Harold v. Bouchat 588 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.