DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., 341 So. 2d 332.

1757 citing documents.

  • McGillivray v. Rapides Iberia Management Ent. 493 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    Reck, supra; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Gadman v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 493 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • Hebert v. First Guar. Bank 493 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Justice Tate observed in Reck that the Supreme Court had "elaborated on the methodology of appellate review of awards for general damages in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., " and reasoned, in part, as follows: Before a trial court award may be questioned as inadequate or excessive, the reviewing court must look first, not to prior awards, but to the individual circumstances of the present case.
  • Deville v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Ins. Co. 492 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., "
  • Bivalacqua v. Aube 493 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Bourgeois v. Bill Watson's Investment, Inc., (La.App.
  • Clairmont v. City of New Orleans 492 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    [3] See Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., rehearing denied January 21, 1977, and Brown v. Lykes Brothers Steamship Company, Inc., (La.App.
  • Levine v. Live Oak Masonic Housing, Inc. 491 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
  • Keith v. Bearden 488 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    Finley, supra, and Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Labauve v. Central Mut. Ins. Co. 491 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    The standard of review for determining whether a general damage award is excessive was set down in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Smith v. Porche Bros. Lumber and Supply, Inc. 491 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Perniciaro v. Brinch, supra ; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Pizani v. Cranmer 493 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    No. 1, supra; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Frey v. Alfred 492 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
  • Ensminger v. McCormick 489 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Caramonta v. Fletcher 489 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
  • Distinguished Tannery v. McGee 488 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Eaglin v. State Farm Insurance Co. 489 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Roy v. Phelps 488 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    After reviewing the trial court's award in light of the restraints imposed by Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., we cannot say that the trial court erred in its assessment of Roy's damages.
  • Attales v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. 488 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
  • Paul v. Murray 488 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
  • Gardiner v. Commercial Union Ins. Companies 488 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Batiste v. Joyce's Supermarket 488 So. 2d 1318 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc., Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Wattigny v. Breaux 488 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
  • Boudreaux v. Murray 489 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    In determining an injured person's net economic loss caused by impairment of earning capacity, one of the factors to be considered is the availability of reasonable employment opportunities for which the claimant is suited by education, experience and physical capacity.
  • Fitzgerald v. Gulf Intern. Cinema Corp. 489 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • Riley v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 489 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    (5th Cir.1984); Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Poe v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 488 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award.” Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Simon v. Hooker Chemical Corp. 489 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    In Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
  • Ortigo v. Merritt 488 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
  • Brown v. City of Slidell 492 So. 2d 3 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Segura v. Hebert 490 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Swann v. City-Parish 492 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Observing that the Supreme Court had "elaborated on the methodology of appellate review of awards for general damages in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., " Justice Tate quoted from Coco, 341 So.2d at 335-36 , as follows: We do re-emphasize, however, that before a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a trial court that the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award.
  • Gagnet v. Zummo 487 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Bourgeois v. Bill Watson's Investments, Inc., (La.App.
  • Breaux v. Lore 487 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
  • Sherlock v. Berry 487 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    Art. 1934(3) (pre-1985); Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
  • Hefner v. BJ McAdams, Inc. 487 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
  • Roy v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 486 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Courmier v. Travelers Ins. Co. 486 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Edwards v. Odom 486 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Davis v. Galilee Baptist Church 486 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    1978); Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Thompson v. Tuggle 486 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Induatries, Inc.
  • Hughes v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 485 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Rodriguez v. Traylor 487 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    In our decree pursuant to that first remand, we followed the guidelines of Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Bosio v. National Tea Co. 485 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    As stated by our Supreme Court in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., : “ ' * * * (2) The awards in other cases serve only as an aid in determining whether there has been an abuse of discretion and rivet no steel frame of uniformity.’ ” The Court went on to state: “ ‘The awards made in other cases provide no scale of uniformity; their use is limited to serving as an aid to
  • Pizzaloto v. Hoover Co. 486 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    and Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., a trial judge is given much discretion in assessing damages and the amount awarded should not be disturbed upon review absent "abuse of discretion."
  • Taylor v. Dupree 484 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
  • Miller v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 484 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Savoie v. Rayco Shipbuilders & Repair, Inc. 484 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Justice Tate observed in Reck that the Supreme Court had “elaborated on the methodology of appellate review of awards for general damages in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.,” and quoted from Coco, at 335 , as follows: We do re-emphasize, however, that before a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a trial court that the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award.
  • Motton v. Travelers Ins. Co. 484 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Ard v. Samedan Oil Corp. 483 So. 2d 925 La. 1986
    Carollo v. Wilson, supra ; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Keys v. Mercy Hosp. of New Orleans 485 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.