Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., 341 So. 2d 332.

1757 citing documents.

Krake v. Exxon Co. USA 466 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Picard v. Guidry 465 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
Hernandez v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets 464 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Verzwyvelt v. Armstrong-Ratterree, Inc. 463 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
*986 Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., [Citations omitted].
Morvant v. Smith 463 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Boswell v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co., Inc.
Free v. Franklin Guest Home, Inc. 463 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
As stated by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., : We do reemphasize, however, that before a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a trial court that the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award....
Jacks v. Allstate Ins. Co. 463 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Landaiche v. Lou-Con 461 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
and believe that this figure represents the lowest point which is reasonably within the discretion of the court.
Wright v. Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co. 461 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
The personal injury damage cases routinely seen by this court use the "clear abuse of discretion"
Rodriguez v. Traylor 461 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Our standard of review in such cases is guided by the principles set out in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., wherein our Supreme Court stated: “We do reemphasize, however, that before a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a trial court that the *417 record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award, [citations omitted] Only after making the finding that the record
Levigne v. Pendleton Memorial Methodist Hospital 463 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
Horton v. Valley Elec. Membership Corp. 461 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Norris v. Pool Well Service, Inc. 460 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
3rd Cir. 1976), reversed as to quantum, (La.
Cutchall v. Great American Pump Co. 460 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
App. 3rd Cir.1976), reversed as to quantum
Carter v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Louisiana St. Univ. 459 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Black v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.App.
Hayes v. Commercial Union Assur. Co. 459 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., -336 (La.
Jackson v. Evans Cooperage Co. 459 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Oliva v. Cafe Maspero, Inc. 459 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
As directed by Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., we must now proceed to lower the award for general damages to the highest point within the jury’s discretion.
Gallardo v. New Orleans Steamboat Co. 459 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Fuselier v. La. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. 458 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
1st Cir.1979)]; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., ..."
Savoie v. Judice 458 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Reck v. Stevens, supra.
Sepulvado v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center, Inc. 459 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
(citations omitted) See also Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Towns v. Georgia Cas. & Sur. Co. 459 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Bourgeois v. Bill Watson's Investments, Inc. 458 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Winterrowd v. Travelers Indem. Co. 452 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
Price v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. 457 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Turning to the second question presented by this appeal, we consider the jury's damage award, as amended by the trial court
Morgan v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 456 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc. 454 So. 2d 1081 La. 1984
Co., supra ; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.
Martin v. Gulf South Beverages, Inc. 454 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Darbonne v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America 452 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
art. 1934(3); Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Hoff v. Canal Refining Co. 454 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Davis v. Anderson 451 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
art. 1934; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
Ponder v. Groendyke Transport, Inc. 454 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Giuffria v. Red River Barge Lines, Inc. 452 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Bender v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Supermarket, Inc. 452 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
As our Supreme Court stated in Coco v. Winston, Industries, Inc., " before a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a trial court ...
Starks v. Silton 453 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Coffil v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 453 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., dictates that the award be lowered to the highest point reasonably within the jury's discretion.
Dobard v. Skate Country, Inc. 451 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
1979); Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Ward v. La. & Ark. Ry. Co. 451 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Reck v. Stevens, supra.
Ed Bulliard Co., Inc. v. FORETICH-ZIMMER CONST. CO. 451 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Recherche, Inc. v. Jewelry Jungle, Inc., supra; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc. (La.
LeRay v. St. Paul Fire and Marine 444 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
Rutherford v. Jenkins 449 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Schweiger v. Sanders 449 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
1st Cir.1979), the court said: “In Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., the Supreme Court made the definitive statement in regard to appellate review of awards for general damages as follows: We do reemphasize, however, that before a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a trial court that the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in mak
Quave v. Bardwell 449 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
1st Cir.1983), citing Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Alley v. Courtney 448 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Burgess v. City of Shreveport 448 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Black v. Ebasco Services, Inc., (La.App.
Wilson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 448 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Boothe v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 447 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Brewington v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections 447 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
3rd Cir.1976) reversed on other grounds we held that an injured worker, doing a job he was assigned to do, and attempting to do it in the best manner he knew how, should not be held contributorily negligent, noting that "The presumption is that one does not intentionally expose himself to a known danger."
Varnado v. Continental Ins. Co. 446 So. 2d 1343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.