DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., 341 So. 2d 332.

1757 citing documents.

  • Prevost v. Cowan 431 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Butler v. Williams 428 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    before a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a trial court that the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award.”
  • Pomares v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 428 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    However, our review of the record fails to reveal any manifest error in the court’s findings, or any abuse of discretion in its damage award
  • Jones v. Sewerage & Water Bd. of New Orleans 430 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    *1068 Having done so we must now raise the award to the lowest point reasonably within the discretion afforded to the trial court in accordance with Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Brown v. McDonald's Corp. 428 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • DiBenedetto v. Stark 428 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Dunaway v. Rester Refrigeration Service, Inc. 428 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Only after such determination of abuse has been reached, is a resort to prior awards appropriate under Coco [ v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
  • Burglass v. US Fidelity and Guar. Co. 427 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Waldon v. Baker 426 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
  • Crow v. Goins 427 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Estate of King v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 427 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Ainsworth v. Government Employees Ins. Co. 427 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
  • Chiasson v. Whitney 427 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    The proper measure for determining future loss earnings is stated in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
  • Ritter v. Willis 425 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Schulze v. Perry 427 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • O'BRIEN v. Delta Gas, Inc. 426 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
  • Cupit v. Grant 425 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    Reck v. Stevens, supra; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Herndon v. Neal 424 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., rehearing denied 1977.
  • Brown v. Southern Farm Bureau Ins. Co. 426 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Code art. 1934(3); Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Young v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. 426 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    See, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
  • McCarroll v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. 427 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    and Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court set out the standards to be followed by appellate courts in reviewing general damage awards.
  • Hunnicutt v. Kent 434 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
  • Price ex rel. Price v. Airco, Inc. 424 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Alexander v. Leger 423 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    The standard of appellate review in cases such as the present was set forth in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., as follows: ".....
  • Raymond Through Raymond v. Deaton 423 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Liner v. City of Houma 423 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Melancon v. Harrell 423 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Trahan ex rel. Walker v. City of Lafayette 422 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    While the award of $5,000 for general damages in this -case may be on the high side, we do not feel justified in reducing the amount under the guide lines prescribed in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Hudson v. Thompson 422 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    See Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Vial v. South Central Bell Telephone 423 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
    Coco v. Winston Ind., Inc., Arceneaux v. Domingue, supra
  • Tate v. Myers 422 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Instead, we are relegated to the position of determining whether the trier of the ease has abused its “great discretion.” Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Holmes v. Texaco, Inc. 422 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Briscoe v. Stewart 423 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Britsch v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 422 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Turner v. Kentie 422 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Further elaboration on the methodology of appellate review of awards for general damages was provided in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., wherein the Supreme Court reemphasized that before a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a trial court the record must clearly reveal that the lower court abused its much discretion in making the award.
  • Hoyt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 420 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
  • Wilkinson v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 421 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    Defendant contends that in determining plaintiff's damages this court must grant the lowest amount which the trial court could have awarded under the circumstances of the case, and in support thereof cites Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
  • Christoff v. Evans Cooperage Co. 420 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Owens v. Hartford Insurance Co. 420 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
  • Parr v. Kelly 420 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Instead, we are relegated to the position of determining whether the trier of the case has abused its “great discretion.” Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Mart v. Schlumberger Ltd. 422 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Josephs v. Austin 420 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Robinson v. FW Woolworth Co. 420 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    In Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., it was emphasized that: "before a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a trial court ...
  • Monnier v. Boutte 420 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Applying the standard enunciated in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., p. 335: “that before a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a trial court that *727 record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award.
  • Greer v. Ouachita Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 420 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
  • Sweeney v. State Farm Mutual Insurance 419 So. 2d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    art. 1934, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and other cases.
  • Planellas v. Doty 418 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • LaCour v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 417 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and Smith v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., (La.
  • Baack v. Lee 419 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
  • Davis v. General Accident Insurance Co. 419 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
    The Supreme Court Case of Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., stated that: “Before a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by Trial Court the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award.