Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., 341 So. 2d 332.

1757 citing documents.

Stewart v. Vidrine 408 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Saucier v. John-Clai Co. 408 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Woods v. Ratliff 407 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Darbonne v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 408 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Wattigney v. Government Employees Insurance Co. 407 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
For us to reduce the amount of the award would simply constitute the substitution of our opinion for that of the trial judge and would be in violation of the principles set *1265 out in the cases of Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Jaconne v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super Markets 407 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Walton v. William Wolf Baking Co., Inc. 406 So. 2d 168 La. 1981
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Blanchard v. A-1 Bit and Tool Co., Inc. 406 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Only after such determination of abuse has been reached, is a resort to prior awards appropriate under Coco [ v. Wilson Industries, Inc., ] for purposes of then determining what would be an appropriate award for the present case.
Howell v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 408 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
McElroy v. Vest 407 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
285 , Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Green v. Rollins 406 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston *320 Industries, Inc.
Alexander v. Terry 405 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Belaire v. Vanderbrook 405 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Guillory v. Texas Petro Gas Co. 405 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.App.
Hickman v. Miller 405 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston, Inc., Boustany v. Fluid Dynamics, supra; Mid-State Homes
Deblieux v. PS & Sons Painting, Inc. 405 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Paige v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 404 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
239 , (1963), through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., we deem our responsibility on this appeal is “.
Cobbs v. Bourgeois 404 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Wattigny v. Lambert 408 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
Venable v. Credeur 404 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., stated, on page 335: “We do reemphasize, however, that before a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a trial court that the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award.
Ahern v. Weicks 403 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
indicated that the approach to take when considering whether an award was inadequate or excessive is to look to the particular facts as applied to the particular plaintiff rather than trying to match injuries and prior awards.
Avilez v. South Jefferson General Hospital 403 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
Hardy v. State, Through Dept. of Highways 404 So. 2d 981 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Parish v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 404 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Suhor v. Gusse 403 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
On our original hearing we reviewed the damage award under the "much discretion" standard of Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., La., , and affirmed.
Burrell v. Guaranty National Insurance 402 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Brasseaux v. Stand-By Corp. 402 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
As to the claim for loss of future wages or loss of earning capacity, our Supreme Court in the case of Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., held: "But the full indemnification to which an injured party is entitled under Article 2315 ( Jordan v. Travelers Insurance Co., 257 La.
Garrison v. State, Through Dept. of Highways 401 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Wilson v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 401 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
App. 3d Cir. 1976), reversed as to quantum (La.
Lee v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 400 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Prince v. Jacobs 400 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Art. 1934(3); Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Ainsworth v. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. 399 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
In such circumstances we are guided by the principle of Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Batiste v. Iberia Parish School Bd. 401 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
*1231 In Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., our Supreme Court stated the rules on appellate review of quantum awards as follows: "We do reemphasize, however, that before a Court of Appeal can disturb an award made by a trial court that the record must clearly reveal that the trier of fact abused its discretion in making its award.
Locicero v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. 399 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Only after such determination of abuse has been reached, is a resort to prior awards appropriate under Coco [Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., ] for purposes of then determining what would be an appropriate award for the present case.
Smith v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 399 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Provost v. A. E. Gravois & Sons, Inc. 398 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
More specifically, Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., restated the principles first enunciated in Miller v. Thomas, 258 La.
Knotts v. State, Dept. of Highways 395 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
As we consider the principles enunciated in the case of Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., we find the awards herein to be somewhat generous but they are within the very broad discretion accorded trial court judges in fixing awards.
Parker v. Travelers Ins. Co. 400 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Baker v. TL James & Co., Inc. 398 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
3d Cir. 1976) amended on other grounds
Hill v. Murco, Inc. 398 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
In considering the validity of the trial court’s
Faulk v. Cagle Supply, Inc. 399 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
1979), and Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
Neville v. Johnson 398 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., LSA-C.C.
McDaniel v. State, Dept. of Transp. & Dev. 398 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Celestine v. Great Southern Oil & Gas Co. 398 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
Clement v. Marion Corp. 398 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Holland v. First Nat. Bank of Crowley 398 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
Breaux v. Roy Young, Inc. 397 So. 2d 1384 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
This Court is bound by the methodology of appellate review of trial court awards as set forth in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., at pages 335-336.
Mullin v. Vessier 400 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
The prior awards may serve as an aid in this determination only where, on an articulated basis, the present award is shown to be greatly disproportionate to past awards (not selected past awards, but the mass of them) for (truly) `similar' injuries, see Coco [ Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., ] at ."
Ferguson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 398 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
and Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., (La.
Moraus v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. 396 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Coco Industries, (La.App.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by