Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., 341 So. 2d 332.
-
Dawn Jones v. Robert Martinez
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
See Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
-
Jones v. Martinez
967 So. 2d 1205
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
See Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
- Ricks v. City of Shreveport 968 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
- John E. Beard, Et Ux. v. Coregis Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Beard v. Coregis Ins. Co. 968 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
-
Lee J. Stagg v. National Automotive Ins. Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., (internal citations omitted).
-
Terrance v. Dow Chemical Co.
971 So. 2d 1058
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
(Citing Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., )
-
Rideau v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
970 So. 2d 564
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., Dennis, 781 So.2d at 21 .
-
Curtis Randall v. Concordia Nursing Home D/B/A Camelot Leisure Living
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
-
Randall v. Concordia Nursing Home
965 So. 2d 559
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
-
Theodore Venissat v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Co., (citing Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., ).
-
Kalil v. HCA Health Services of Louisiana
963 So. 2d 511
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
-
Charles Layssard v. State of La., Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
-
Layssard v. STATE, DEPART. OF PUBLIC SAFETY
963 So. 2d 1053
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
-
Bellard v. American Cent. Ins. Co.
958 So. 2d 107
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
As the supreme court wisely noted in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., "it is impossible for an appellate court to judge what evidence in a particular case was given special weight by the finder of fact."
-
Nora Miller, Et Vir v. Lammico
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
We review the trial court’s general 7 damage award using the abuse of discretion standard set forth in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
-
Eugene Bellard v. American Central Ins. Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
As the supreme court wisely noted in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., “it is impossible for an appellate court to judge what evidence in a particular case was given special weight by the finder of fact.” True to that notion, we cannot find sufficient evidence in the record to support the contention that the trial court erroneously relied upon the force of the August collis
-
Miller v. Lammico
958 So. 2d 775
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
We review the trial court's general damage award using the abuse of discretion standard set forth in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
-
Earls v. McDowell
960 So. 2d 242
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
-
Kaiser v. Hardin
953 So. 2d 802
La. 2007
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
-
Leighow v. Crump
960 So. 2d 122
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
-
Tremblay v. Allstate Insurance Company
955 So. 2d 700
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
239 , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [ v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages."
-
Shamoindra Manning v. Edgar G. Barrilleaux
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
We review the trial court’s general damage award using the abuse of discretion standard set forth in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
-
Manning v. Barrilleaux
952 So. 2d 919
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
We review the trial court's general damage award using the abuse of discretion standard set forth in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
-
Ridgeway v. Pierre
950 So. 2d 884
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
239 , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages."
-
Narcisse Thibodeaux v. State of La, Thru the Dotd
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
-
Johnson v. State Ex Rel. DOTD
946 So. 2d 682
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
-
Jordan v. Vice
943 So. 2d 1278
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
-
Robert C. Jordan v. Zoie R. Vice
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
-
Paul Darren Williams v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. and Venson R. Aymond
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
-
Williams v. Aymond
945 So. 2d 823
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
-
Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc.
946 So. 2d 144
La. 2006
Clement, 666 So.2d at 611 ; Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
-
Delton Ray Coutee v. Rayland K. Beurlot
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
-
Coutee v. Beurlot
943 So. 2d 637
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
-
Gerald W. Greer v. State of La., Dotd
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
“Once a trial court has granted a JNOV on the issue of damages, and has conducted its own independent assessment of the damages as trier of fact, that decision becomes the judgment of the court and it is reviewed on appeal for an abuse of discretion under the standard set forth in Coco v. Winston [Indus., Inc., ].” Love v. Lewis, 00-6, p. 7 (La.App.
-
Greer v. State, ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development
941 So. 2d 141
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
“Once a trial court has granted a JNOV on the issue of damages, and has conducted its own independent assessment of the damages as trier of fact, that decision becomes the judgment of the court and it is reviewed on appeal for an abuse of discretion under the standard set forth in Coco v. Winston [Indus., Inc., (La.
-
Greer v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP.
941 So. 2d 141
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
"Once a trial court has granted a JNOV on the issue of damages, and has conducted its own independent assessment of the damages as trier of fact, that decision becomes the judgment of the court and it is reviewed on appeal for an abuse of discretion under the standard set forth in Coco v. Winston [Indus., Inc., (La.
-
Barbara Shelton, Et Vir. v. James G. Hair
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
-
Shelton v. Hair
939 So. 2d 685
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc., (La.
-
Davis v. Allstate Property & Cas. Ins. Co.
941 So. 2d 602
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Regarding the allocation of fault in this circumstance, the Supreme Court adopted the standard set forth in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
-
Lino v. Allstate Insurance Co.
937 So. 2d 888
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.
-
Mel McDaniel v. Carencro Lions Club
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
As for damages, we only reviewed the trial court’s JNOV award of $800,000 for pain and suffering (the jury had allocated $0) using the standard set forth in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
-
McDaniel v. Carencro Lions Club
934 So. 2d 945
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
As for damages, we only reviewed the trial court's JNOV award of $800,000 for pain and suffering (the jury had allocated $0) using the standard set forth in Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
-
Meyer v. Tufaro
934 So. 2d 861
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc., cert.
-
Thomas v. AP Green Industries, Inc.
933 So. 2d 843
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Youn, 623 So.2d at 1260 -61 (citing Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., ).
- Sorrel v. Allstate Insurance 931 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
-
Christal Suire v. Lcs Corrections Services, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
-
Suire v. LCS Corrections Services, Inc.
930 So. 2d 221
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
-
Williams v. Roberts
930 So. 2d 121
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
239 , (1963) through Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., and through Reck [v. Stevens, ] to the present case is that the discretion vested in the trier of fact is "great," and even vast, so that an appellate court should rarely disturb an award of general damages.
-
Joseph Lionel Melancon v. Lafayette Ins. Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Coco v. Winston Indus., Inc.