DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Morse v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., 344 So. 2d 1353.

59 citing documents.

  • Langford v. Cahn Electric Co. 403 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Both litigants rely on the recent pronouncement on the subject by the Supreme Court in Morse v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., (La.
  • Lambert v. Maryland Cas. Co. 403 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
  • Lebouef v. Liner 396 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Art. 1893, 3 Plainol, Volume 2, Section 1269, p. 720; Morse v. J. Ray McDermott and Co., Inc.
  • Housing Auth. of City of Abbeville v. Hebert 387 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    In Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Company v. International Harvester Company, supra, our Supreme Court dealt extensively with this doctrine, stating: *697 "This Court expressly recognized the doctrine of abuse of rights in Morse v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., and has employed a similar analysis in earlier decisions.
  • Seifert v. General Tire & Rubber Co. 381 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    This instruction was based on the holding of Morse v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., that if an employer agrees to pay a bonus on certain conditions and prevents the employee who is bound to perform the condition from doing so, without fault on the.part of the employee, the condition is considered as fulfilled.
  • Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Hunt 371 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    Morse v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.
  • Illinois Cent. Gulf R. Co. v. International Harvester 368 So. 2d 1009 La. 1979
    This Court expressly recognized the doctrine of abuse of rights in Morse v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., (La.
  • Berteau v. Wiener Corp. 362 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    In Morse v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., (1976), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a forfeiture clause in the employer's profit-sharing plan was manifestly unjust where the unilateral act of the employer prevented fulfillment of the condition to his receipt of benefits.
  • Pender v. Power Structures, Inc. 359 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    This decision is an extension of the decision in Morse v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., which was based both on the public policy expressed in R.S.