DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hill, 340 So. 2d 309.

24 citing documents.

  • State v. Howard 258 So. 3d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    State v. Hill , , 311 (La.
  • State v. Hubbard 103 So. 3d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Marcus Quinn, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    (To the extent that “[a] hearing on a multiple offender bill is a trial in only a very broad sense.
  • State v. Quinn 38 So. 3d 1102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    (To the extent that “[a] hearing on a multiple offender bill is a trial in only a very broad sense ....
  • State v. Babineaux 8 So. 3d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Schnyder, 06-29 (La.
  • State v. Tassin 998 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    In support of this argument, State v. *284 Johnson, and State v. Wooten, 136 La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Melvin Tassin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    In support of this argument, and State v. Wooten, 136 La.
  • State v. Bourgeois 998 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Mays 929 So. 2d 1231 La. 2006
    Principles of res judicata generally do not apply to habitual offender proceedings, and the circumstances of the present case do not justify according finality to the 2003 adjudication and sentence of defendant as a second offender.
  • State v. Duplechin 922 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    and State v. Mays, 05-116 (La.11/29/05), , which address limited exceptions to that principle.
  • State v. Mays 917 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    He acknowledges the jurisprudence that states the principle of res judicata does not apply to multiple offender proceedings, supports his position that res judicata applies in this particular case.
  • State v. Townsend 874 So. 2d 152 La. 2004
    (principles of res judicata and double jeopardy do not apply to habitual offender hearings); (same).
  • State v. Davis 734 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    However, “a multiple bill proceeding is in the nature, merely, of an enhancement of penalty rather than of a prosecution for a crime.”
  • Richey v. Richey 733 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Bychurch 722 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Denis 692 So. 2d 1055 La. 1997
    (To the extent that "[a] hearing on a multiple offender bill is a trial in only a very broad sense....
  • State v. Hongo 625 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Bennett 544 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    and cases cited therein; (La.App.
  • State v. McIntyre 496 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Johnson 432 So. 2d 815 La. 1983
  • State v. Stott 395 So. 2d 714 La. 1981
  • State v. Ranker 370 So. 2d 885 La. 1979
  • State v. White 354 So. 2d 1360 La. 1978
  • State v. De La Beckwith 344 So. 2d 360 La. 1977