Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bolen, 338 So. 2d 97.

14 citing documents.

State v. McElveen 73 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Allen 682 So. 2d 713 La. 1996
State v. Brown 514 So. 2d 99 La. 1987
-33 (La.1983); State ex rel.
State v. Kendig 451 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Benoit 440 So. 2d 129 La. 1983
State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King 436 So. 2d 559 La. 1983
State v. Albert 381 So. 2d 424 La. 1980
which involved cross-examination about matters not covered on direct.
State v. Nettleton 367 So. 2d 755 La. 1979
State v. Schoonover, 252 La.
State v. Mitchell 362 So. 2d 501 La. 1978
State v. Banks 362 So. 2d 540 La. 1978
State v. Lovett 345 So. 2d 1139 La. 1977
City of Baton Rouge v. Short 345 So. 2d 37 La. 1977
Recently, we held that an opening statement by the state is not required in a bench trial so long as the failure to make such a statement does not result in unfair surprise to defendant.
State v. Kinchen 342 So. 2d 174 La. 1977
State v. Bolen, La., (1976); State v. Clark, 231 La.
State v. Spot 340 So. 2d 1349 La. 1976
which also involved prosecution for a relative felony (negligent homicide) and a bench trial, we held that the trial judge did not err in refusing to order the state to make an opening statement.