Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Badon, 338 So. 2d 665.

43 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Charles Nicholas Brown, Jr. A/K/A Charles Brown, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
See, e.g., State v. Dorthey, supra
State of Louisiana v. Will Antonio Celestine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
See, e.g., State v. Dorthey, supra
State of Louisiana v. McKartney Young La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
See, e.g., State v. Dorthey, supra
State v. Young 271 So. 3d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
See, e.g., State v. Dorthey , supra ; State v. Badon , , 670 (La.1976).
State v. Harris 998 So. 2d 55 La. 2008
State v. Clark 780 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
See State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98); ; (1993); (1976).
Townley v. State, Department of Public Safety & Corrections 762 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
the supreme court rejected a defendant’s claim that his sentence under the habitual offender statute violated his equal protection and due process rights.
State v. Gass 747 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Madison 743 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Carter 746 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
See, e.g., State v. Dorthey, supra
State v. Johnson 709 So. 2d 672 La. 1998
See, e.g., State v. Dorthey, supra
State v. Finley 664 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
preme court held that *782 prior convictions can be used to form the basis of habitual offender bills unless “a period of five years has intervened between the date of the commission of the current or latest felony and the expiration of the sentence imposed for the next | ^previous felony conviction.” The court subsequently reaffirmed the holding in Broussard, 34 So.2d at 885 , (La.
State v. Dorthey 623 So. 2d 1276 La. 1993
State v. Claiborne 624 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
This same argument was specifically rejected in State v. Williams, supra , (La.App.
State v. Bourque 622 So. 2d 198 La. 1993
State v. Williams 620 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
State v. Carter 610 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Oliver 526 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
State in Interest of RC 514 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Bias, supra; C.Cr.P.
State v. Roy 496 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Reynolds 473 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Bell 471 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Lastrapes v. South Cent. Bell Telephone Co. 473 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Miles 464 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
15:529.1 and State v. Ugarte, 176 La.
State v. Jones 462 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
15:529.1 and State v. Ugarte, 176 La.
State v. Thomas 463 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
15:529.1 and State v. Ugarte, 176 La.
State v. Robertson 464 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Coutee v. American Druggist Ins. Co. of Cincinnati 453 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
For example, the Supreme Court found no error in allowing a violating witness to testify because the trial judge determined that the testimony was based upon the witness' own memory.
State v. Adams 446 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Allen 431 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
State v. Simmons 422 So. 2d 138 La. 1982
art. 807; State v. White, 254 La.
State v. Lawson 410 So. 2d 1101 La. 1982
15:529.1 and State v. Ugarte, 176 La.
State v. Coleman 390 So. 2d 865 La. 1980
State v. Holmes 388 So. 2d 722 La. 1980
State v. Matthews 380 So. 2d 43 La. 1980
State v. Lewis 367 So. 2d 1155 La. 1979
State v. Harris 367 So. 2d 322 La. 1979
State v. Turner 365 So. 2d 1352 La. 1978
State v. Wilson 360 So. 2d 166 La. 1978
State v. Mullins, supra ; State v. Ardoin, supra ; State v. Batts, supra
State v. King 355 So. 2d 1305 La. 1978
State v. Mullins 353 So. 2d 243 La. 1977
State v. Ardoin, supra ; State v. Batts, supra
State Ex Rel. Clark v. Marullo 352 So. 2d 223 La. 1977
Hopkins v. Department of Highways 350 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
For example, the Supreme Court found no error in allowing a violating witness to testify because the trial judge determined that the testimony was based upon the witness' own memory.