Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Marmillion, 339 So. 2d 788.

47 citing documents.

  • State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
    However, defendant submitted “proposed jury instruction 2.” The trial court denied the charge as written, noting that “the proposed charge as to ‘great bodily harm’ is not considered to be accurate as to the law.” See, -796 (La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Teddy Chester La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
  • State of Louisiana v. Simon Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. McGuffie 962 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Clark 851 So. 2d 1055 La. 2003
  • State v. Myers 839 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Branch 759 So. 2d 31 La. 2000
    ("Once the state has met its traditional burden of proof ...
  • State v. Lucky 755 So. 2d 845 La. 1999
  • State v. Thibodeaux 750 So. 2d 916 La. 1999
  • State v. Smith 677 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    State v. Pravata, supra.
  • State v. Campbell 673 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Armstrong 649 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Peterson 619 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    State *789 v. Marmillion
  • State v. Knowles 598 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    State v. Pravata, supra .
  • State v. Ondek 584 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    State v. Pravata, 522 So.2d at 614 .
  • State v. Joseph 573 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
  • State v. Moore 568 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Pravata 522 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Wiley 513 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    State v. Domino, 234 La.
  • State v. Thomas 504 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "The law does not require the production of nonexistent portions *917 of the confession or portions which cannot be recalled."
  • State v. Perry 502 So. 2d 543 La. 1986
    Finally, even if the whole statement was not admitted into evidence, this Court has *556 treated a
  • State v. Oliver 499 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    the prosecution introduced the testimony of a police officer relating to an inculpatory statement made by the defendant.
  • State v. Thomas 470 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Arnold 466 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    in which an officer also testified as to a statement, the court stated: "[I]n the absence of proof to the contrary, the fact that the purported statement of the accused as testified to by the investigating officer does not consist of a verbatim reiteration of the conversation between them, due to the witnes
  • State v. Handley 453 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Guidry 450 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Adams 446 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Duncan 420 So. 2d 1105 La. 1982
  • State v. Lefevre 419 So. 2d 862 La. 1982
  • State v. MacK 403 So. 2d 8 La. 1981
  • State v. Tompkins 403 So. 2d 644 La. 1981
  • State v. Morgan 389 So. 2d 364 La. 1980
  • State v. Poree 386 So. 2d 1331 La. 1980
  • State v. Martin 376 So. 2d 300 La. 1979
  • State v. Bonanno 373 So. 2d 1284 La. 1979
  • State v. Weber 364 So. 2d 952 La. 1978
    Art. 652; State v. Marmillion, La., (1976).
  • State v. Burge 362 So. 2d 1371 La. 1978
    See State v. *1378 Jackson, La., (1977); State v. Clark, La., (1976); State v. Marmillion, La., (1976).
  • State v. King 355 So. 2d 1305 La. 1978
  • State v. Hillman 353 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
  • State v. Rollins 351 So. 2d 470 La. 1977
  • State v. Schouest 351 So. 2d 462 La. 1977
    1563 , 51 L.Ed.2d 782 (1977)
  • State v. Charles 350 So. 2d 595 La. 1977
  • State v. Spears 350 So. 2d 603 La. 1977
    State v. Hodges, La., (1977); State v. Clark, La., (1976); State v. Marmillion, La., (1976); State v. Marks, La., (1976).
  • State v. Hodges 349 So. 2d 250 La. 1977
    State v. Marmillion, La., (1976); State v. Clark, La., (1976); State v. Marks, La., (1976).
  • State v. George 346 So. 2d 694 La. 1977
  • State v. Jackson 344 So. 2d 961 La. 1977
    In State v. Marmillion, La., (La.
  • State v. Sepulvado 342 So. 2d 630 La. 1977
    this Court had occasion to pass upon a similar contention where the witness could not recall everything which was said at the time the inculpatory statement was made.