Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Young, 337 So. 2d 1196.
-
State of Louisiana v. Vernon Holden A/K/A Vernon Demtrius Holden, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
684 (1951), the Court also addressed that same 24-hour delay, and found that “if [defendant] is denied the right to this delay, any sentence so imposed is void.” More recent decisions of this Court include a and a pair of decisions authored by Justice Marcus
-
State of Louisiana v. Michael Jerome Cochran A/K/A Michael Jerome Cochran, Jr. A/K/A Michael Cochran
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
684 (1951), the Court also addressed that same 24-hour delay, and found that “if [defendant] is denied the right to this delay, any sentence so imposed is void.” More recent decisions of this Court include a and a pair of decisions authored by Justice Marcus, [,]
-
State of Louisiana v. Trivual A. Charles -Aka- Trivual Batiste -Aka- Trivual Charles
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
684 (1951), the Court also addressed that same 24-hour delay, and found that “if [defendant] is denied the right to this delay, any sentence so imposed is void.” More recent decisions of this Court include a and a pair of decisions authored by Justice Marcus
-
State of Louisiana v. Elvin Bryant Jinks, Jr. -Aka- Elvin Jinks
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
684 (1951), the Court also addressed that same 24-hour delay, and found that “if [defendant] is denied the right to this delay, any sentence so imposed is void.” More recent decisions of this Court include a and a pair of decisions authored by Justice Marcus
-
State v. Jinks
267 So. 3d 688
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
More recent decisions of this Court include a and a pair of decisions authored by Justice Marcus
-
State v. Charles
270 So. 3d 859
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
More recent decisions of this Court include a per curiam opinion in State v. Hampton , and a pair of decisions authored by Justice Marcus, State v. Young , and State v. Hutto
-
State of Louisiana v. Robbie Ray Frith AKA - Robbie Frith
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
684 (1951), the Court also addressed that same 24-hour delay, and found that “if [defendant] is denied the right to this delay, any sentence so imposed is void.” More recent decisions of this Court include a and a pair of decisions authored by Justice Marcus
-
State of Louisiana v. Tyrone Mitchell
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
and found the defendant‟s claim lacked merit.
-
State v. Mitchell
125 So. 3d 586
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
and found the defendant’s claim lacked merit.
-
State of Louisiana v. Timothy Dale Perkins
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
also addressed that same 24-hour delay, and found that “if [defendant] is denied the right to this delay, any sentence so imposed is void.” More recent decisions of this Court include a and a pair of decisions 3 authored by Justice Marcus
-
State v. Perkins
54 So. 3d 799
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
684 (1951), the Court also addressed that same 24-hour delay, and found that “if [defendant] is denied the right to this delay, any sentence so imposed is void.” More recent decisions of this Court include a and a pair of decisions ^authored by Justice Marcus
-
State v. Tilley
767 So. 2d 6
La. 2000
For instance, this Court held that a reference by the district attorney to a "promise" of the jurors that they would return a verdict of guilty if warranted by the facts was only a reminder by the prosecutor of the juror's sworn duty, and therefore did not rise to the level of reversible error.
-
State v. Augustine
555 So. 2d 1331
La. 1990
*1334 More recent decisions of this Court include a and a pair of decisions authored by Justice Marcus, (La.
- State v. Morgan 459 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
-
State v. Colvin
452 So. 2d 1214
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
See for example State v. Kelly, supra
-
State v. Williams
386 So. 2d 1342
La. 1980
State v. Simms, No. 65,582
-
State v. Simms
381 So. 2d 472
La. 1980
and cases cited therein.
- State v. Sykes 364 So. 2d 1293 La. 1978
- State v. Guillot 353 So. 2d 1005 La. 1977
- State v. Bazile 352 So. 2d 1019 La. 1977
- State v. Schouest 351 So. 2d 462 La. 1977
- State v. Sheppard 350 So. 2d 615 La. 1977
- State v. Taylor 349 So. 2d 1245 La. 1977
- State v. Griffin 349 So. 2d 317 La. 1977
-
State v. Hutto
349 So. 2d 318
La. 1977
art. 873; Even though defendant did not object to this error at the time of sentencing or urge it on appeal, the error shall be considered by this court since it is an error discoverable by mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings and without inspection of the evidenc
- State v. Hardy 344 So. 2d 1018 La. 1977