Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Young, 337 So. 2d 1196.

26 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Vernon Holden A/K/A Vernon Demtrius Holden, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
    684 (1951), the Court also addressed that same 24-hour delay, and found that “if [defendant] is denied the right to this delay, any sentence so imposed is void.” More recent decisions of this Court include a and a pair of decisions authored by Justice Marcus
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael Jerome Cochran A/K/A Michael Jerome Cochran, Jr. A/K/A Michael Cochran La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    684 (1951), the Court also addressed that same 24-hour delay, and found that “if [defendant] is denied the right to this delay, any sentence so imposed is void.” More recent decisions of this Court include a and a pair of decisions authored by Justice Marcus, [,]
  • State of Louisiana v. Trivual A. Charles -Aka- Trivual Batiste -Aka- Trivual Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    684 (1951), the Court also addressed that same 24-hour delay, and found that “if [defendant] is denied the right to this delay, any sentence so imposed is void.” More recent decisions of this Court include a and a pair of decisions authored by Justice Marcus
  • State of Louisiana v. Elvin Bryant Jinks, Jr. -Aka- Elvin Jinks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    684 (1951), the Court also addressed that same 24-hour delay, and found that “if [defendant] is denied the right to this delay, any sentence so imposed is void.” More recent decisions of this Court include a and a pair of decisions authored by Justice Marcus
  • State v. Jinks 267 So. 3d 688 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    More recent decisions of this Court include a and a pair of decisions authored by Justice Marcus
  • State v. Charles 270 So. 3d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    More recent decisions of this Court include a per curiam opinion in State v. Hampton , and a pair of decisions authored by Justice Marcus, State v. Young , and State v. Hutto
  • State of Louisiana v. Robbie Ray Frith AKA - Robbie Frith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    684 (1951), the Court also addressed that same 24-hour delay, and found that “if [defendant] is denied the right to this delay, any sentence so imposed is void.” More recent decisions of this Court include a and a pair of decisions authored by Justice Marcus
  • State of Louisiana v. Tyrone Mitchell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    and found the defendant‟s claim lacked merit.
  • State v. Mitchell 125 So. 3d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    and found the defendant’s claim lacked merit.
  • State of Louisiana v. Timothy Dale Perkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    also addressed that same 24-hour delay, and found that “if [defendant] is denied the right to this delay, any sentence so imposed is void.” More recent decisions of this Court include a and a pair of decisions 3 authored by Justice Marcus
  • State v. Perkins 54 So. 3d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    684 (1951), the Court also addressed that same 24-hour delay, and found that “if [defendant] is denied the right to this delay, any sentence so imposed is void.” More recent decisions of this Court include a and a pair of decisions ^authored by Justice Marcus
  • State v. Tilley 767 So. 2d 6 La. 2000
    For instance, this Court held that a reference by the district attorney to a "promise" of the jurors that they would return a verdict of guilty if warranted by the facts was only a reminder by the prosecutor of the juror's sworn duty, and therefore did not rise to the level of reversible error.
  • State v. Augustine 555 So. 2d 1331 La. 1990
    *1334 More recent decisions of this Court include a and a pair of decisions authored by Justice Marcus, (La.
  • State v. Morgan 459 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Colvin 452 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    See for example State v. Kelly, supra
  • State v. Williams 386 So. 2d 1342 La. 1980
    State v. Simms, No. 65,582
  • State v. Simms 381 So. 2d 472 La. 1980
    and cases cited therein.
  • State v. Sykes 364 So. 2d 1293 La. 1978
  • State v. Guillot 353 So. 2d 1005 La. 1977
  • State v. Bazile 352 So. 2d 1019 La. 1977
  • State v. Schouest 351 So. 2d 462 La. 1977
  • State v. Sheppard 350 So. 2d 615 La. 1977
  • State v. Taylor 349 So. 2d 1245 La. 1977
  • State v. Griffin 349 So. 2d 317 La. 1977
  • State v. Hutto 349 So. 2d 318 La. 1977
    art. 873; Even though defendant did not object to this error at the time of sentencing or urge it on appeal, the error shall be considered by this court since it is an error discoverable by mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings and without inspection of the evidenc
  • State v. Hardy 344 So. 2d 1018 La. 1977