Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ford, 338 So. 2d 107.

98 citing documents.

State v. LaCaze 824 So. 2d 1063 La. 2002
[24] State v. Landry, 97-0499 (La.6/29/99), -216
State v. Howard 805 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Const. art. I, § 19 (1974)
State v. Johnson 807 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Chattman 800 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
(reversal required when record failed to contain the testimony of a State and defense expert witness); (La.
State v. Belt 798 So. 2d 1038 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
appellate counsel was not counsel at trial and the court reporter could not provide a transcript of the testimony at trial.
State v. Brown 793 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Const, art. I, § 19 (1974); State v. McGhee, 96-1656 (La.App.
State v. Gibson 785 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Frank 803 So. 2d 1 La. 2001
(reversal required when record failed to contain the testimony of a state and defense expert witness); (reversal required when record was missing *20 the testimony of four state witnesses and the voir dire of prospective jurors).
State v. Deruise 802 So. 2d 1224 La. 2001
See State v. Landry, 97-0499 (La.6/29/99), (finding appellate record so deficient that the court could not properly review the case for error); Robinson, supra (holding that reversal required when record failed to contain the testimony of a state and defense expert witness); (determining that reversal required when record was missing the testimony of four state witnesses and the voir dire of prospective jurors).
State v. Harris 781 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Johnson 778 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
art. 843; State v. Mamon, 26,337 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/16/94), , writ denied, 95-0220 (La.6/2/95), .
State v. Mims 769 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Alford 765 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Wesley 759 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
art. 843; State v. Mamon, 26,337 (La.App.2d Cir.12/16/94), , writ denied, 95-0220 (La.6/2/95), ; (La.
State v. Harris 761 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
: Without a complete record from which a transcript for appeal may be prepared, a defendant's right of appellate review is rendered meaningless.
State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
(reversal required when record failed to contain the testimony of a State and defense expert witness); (reversal required when record missing the testimony of four State witnesses and the voir dire of prospective jurors).
State v. Lambert 749 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
751 So.2d at 215 -16 ().
State v. Emerson 763 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Landry 751 So. 2d 214 La. 1999
a second-degree murder conviction in which appellate counsel did not serve as trial counsel and the court reporter failed to record the testimony of four state witnesses, voir dire, and the State's opening statement, we held: "Without a complete record from which a transcript for appeal may be prepared
State v. Ruffin 738 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Castleberry 758 So. 2d 749 La. 1999
State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96)
State v. McGhee 739 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Const. art. I, § 19 (1974)
State v. Scott 720 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Brumfield 737 So. 2d 660 La. 1998
State v. Small 693 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Lewis 687 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Gonzales 680 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
portions of the trial transcript were missing from the appeal record because the court reporter for some unknown reason did not record those portions.
State v. Allen 682 So. 2d 713 La. 1996
State v. Tart 672 So. 2d 116 La. 1996
held: A slight inaccuracy in a record or an inconsequential omission from it which is immaterial to a proper determination of the appeal would not cause us to reverse defendant's conviction.
State v. Diggs 657 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Ford 650 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Mamon 648 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Wise 644 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
State v. Murphy 613 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
This court rejected this argument, finding that these missing portions of trial transcript were inconsequential omissions, where that Court found missing portions of the trial transcript to be indispens *781 able to the determination of the merits of the appeal.
State v. Lyons 597 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Baker 582 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Cage 554 So. 2d 39 La. 1989
State v. Willis 552 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Richardson 529 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Counterman 461 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
6 Records of the Louisiana Constitutional Convention of 1973: Convention Transcripts, p. 721 for August 15, 1973; Hargrave, The Judiciary Article of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974, 37 La.L.Rev.
State v. Thetford 445 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1091 La. 1983
State v. Robinson 387 So. 2d 1143 La. 1980
State v. Vaughn 378 So. 2d 905 La. 1979
State v. Goodbier 367 So. 2d 356 La. 1979
State v. Rooney, 187 La.
State v. Kemp 359 So. 2d 978 La. 1978
In State v. Ford, La., (1976), this Court stated: "A slight inaccuracy in a record or an inconsequential omission from it which is immaterial to a proper determination of the appeal would not cause us to reverse defendant's conviction."
State v. Jones 351 So. 2d 1194 La. 1977
this Court considered the proper remedy to *1196 be applied in a case in which the appellate record is incomplete through no fault of defendant or his counsel.
State v. Francis 345 So. 2d 1120 La. 1977
ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 6 In two supplemental briefs the defendant urges that State v. Ford, La., (1976) warrants reversal of his conviction.