Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 339 So. 2d 829.
-
State of Louisiana Versus Billy Lampton
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
Wilson, 432 So.2d at 348 ( (La.
- State of Louisiana Versus Isaiah Doyle La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
- State of Louisiana v. Leo Dorsey La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
- State of Louisiana v. Jamal Christopher Lacon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
- State of Louisiana v. Raven Lamar Wiltz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
- State v. Bentley 182 So. 3d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- State of Louisiana v. Demarcus W. Law La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
- State v. Law 110 So. 3d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- State v. French 79 So. 3d 1155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
-
State of Louisiana v. Eric L. Hunter
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
at 1374 (La.1978); at 1175 (La.1977); at 833 (La.1976).
-
State v. Hunter
41 So. 3d 546
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
at 1374 (La.1978); at 1175 (La.1977); at 833 (La.1976).
- State of Louisiana v. Kiley M. Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- State v. Williams 878 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
-
State v. Mitchell
779 So. 2d 698
La. 2001
State v. Taylor, 93-2201 p. 7 (La.2/28/96), -69 ( cert.
-
State v. Jones
741 So. 2d 706
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
the supreme court stated that “as a general rule, the propriety of denying a motion to suppress evidence becomes a moot issue if the evidence is not introduced at trial.” Although a motion to suppress was not filed in this matter, the same analogy applies.
-
State v. Douglas
707 So. 2d 512
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
at 1374 (La.1978); at 1175 (La.1977); at 833 (La.
-
State v. Taylor
669 So. 2d 364
La. 1996
State *369 v. Arvie, cert.
- State v. Davis 637 So. 2d 1012 La. 1994
-
State v. Bourque
622 So. 2d 198
La. 1993
State v. Allen, [ 129 La.
- State v. Weiland 562 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
- State v. Holland 544 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- State v. Smith 511 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
-
State v. London
478 So. 2d 1340
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Allen, [ 129 La.
-
State v. Butler
462 So. 2d 1280
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Allen, [ 129 La.
- State v. Craddock 435 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Wilson 432 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
State v. Gomez
433 So. 2d 230
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-579 (La.1981); -834 (La.
-
State v. Shapiro
431 So. 2d 372
La. 1983
at 1373 (La.1978); at 1175 (La.1977); at 833 (La.1976).
- State v. Ferdinand 465 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
State v. Interest of Anderson
417 So. 2d 518
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
15:43s 1 Arnold Anderson cannot be found guilty of Simple Criminal Damage to Property solely on circumstantial evidence, unless the facts proved by such evidence exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.
- State v. LaFleur 398 So. 2d 1074 La. 1981
- State v. Williamson 389 So. 2d 1328 La. 1980
- State v. Myles 389 So. 2d 12 La. 1980
- State v. Jones 381 So. 2d 416 La. 1980
- State v. Guillory 373 So. 2d 133 La. 1979
-
State v. Burge
362 So. 2d 1371
La. 1978
State v. Hills, La., (1977); State v. Moore, La., (1976); State v. Smith, La., cert.
- State v. Mallett 357 So. 2d 1105 La. 1978
-
State v. Hamilton
356 So. 2d 1360
La. 1978
-34 (La.1976), defendant objected to only one of several allegedly prejudicial remarks made by the prosecutor in closing argument.
- State v. Johnson 352 So. 2d 1285 La. 1977
- State v. Progue 350 So. 2d 1181 La. 1977
-
State v. Abney
347 So. 2d 498
La. 1977
14:30 (1973), first degree murder, has likewise invalidated the statutory definition of the offense, see State v. Smith, La., (1976), or the lesser homicide offenses created by related statutes
- State v. Lee 346 So. 2d 682 La. 1977
- State v. Tyler 342 So. 2d 574 La. 1977
- State v. Ervin 340 So. 2d 1379 La. 1976
- State v. Bennett 341 So. 2d 847 La. 1976
-
State v. Moore
340 So. 2d 1351
La. 1976
When the same issue was raised recently in State v. Smith, La., (1976), we held: “Defendant maintains that when the death penalty was declared unconstitutional, first degree murder lost its status as a capital crime, and he should have been remanded to the custody of the juvenile court.