Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ward v. Ward, 339 So. 2d 839.

61 citing documents.

  • Labeuve v. Labeuve 352 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
  • Villemarette v. Villemarette 352 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    The issue raised by appellant’s
  • Calloway v. Calloway 351 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
  • Depner v. Barker 351 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
  • Hyrne v. Hyrne 351 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    ” The words “sufficient means” as follows: “As used in Article 160, means refers to available resources, such as property or money, from which the wants of life may be supplied.
  • Henson v. Henson 350 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
    in which the court held: The parties entered into the alimony waiver agreement before the divorce and while they were still husband and wife.
  • Pearce v. Pearce 344 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
    We do, nevertheless, note that Ward v. Ward, La.1976, , rules that the ex-wife's earning potential is not a factor.
  • Vanier v. Vanier 344 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
  • Vollenweider v. Brescher 344 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    The trial judge ruled “that the Plaintiff’s recent major surgery was of a cosmetic nature and therefore should not be a consideration in her request for alimony.” That reasoning is inconsistent with Ward v. Ward, La.1976, , which holds that a wife’s earning capacity is not a factor in fixing alimony.
  • Favrot v. Barnes 339 So. 2d 843 La. 1976
    For the reasons assigned in Ward v. Ward, No. 58,279, La., (1976), handed down this date, we hold that the earning capacity of an unemployed, divorced wife does not bar her from alimony under Article 160 of the Louisiana Civil Code.
  • La Hood v. La Hood 340 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    The Louisiana Supreme Court has reversed