Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ward v. Ward, 339 So. 2d 839.
- Labeuve v. Labeuve 352 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
-
Villemarette v. Villemarette
352 So. 2d 413
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
The issue raised by appellant’s
- Calloway v. Calloway 351 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
- Depner v. Barker 351 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
-
Hyrne v. Hyrne
351 So. 2d 1244
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
” The words “sufficient means” as follows: “As used in Article 160, means refers to available resources, such as property or money, from which the wants of life may be supplied.
-
Henson v. Henson
350 So. 2d 979
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
in which the court held: The parties entered into the alimony waiver agreement before the divorce and while they were still husband and wife.
-
Pearce v. Pearce
344 So. 2d 75
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
We do, nevertheless, note that Ward v. Ward, La.1976, , rules that the ex-wife's earning potential is not a factor.
- Vanier v. Vanier 344 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
-
Vollenweider v. Brescher
344 So. 2d 1182
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
The trial judge ruled “that the Plaintiff’s recent major surgery was of a cosmetic nature and therefore should not be a consideration in her request for alimony.” That reasoning is inconsistent with Ward v. Ward, La.1976, , which holds that a wife’s earning capacity is not a factor in fixing alimony.
-
Favrot v. Barnes
339 So. 2d 843
La. 1976
For the reasons assigned in Ward v. Ward, No. 58,279, La., (1976), handed down this date, we hold that the earning capacity of an unemployed, divorced wife does not bar her from alimony under Article 160 of the Louisiana Civil Code.
-
La Hood v. La Hood
340 So. 2d 624
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
The Louisiana Supreme Court has reversed