Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Perique, 340 So. 2d 1369.

30 citing documents.

  • State v. Singer 45 So. 3d 171 La. 2010
    Such testimony would be untrustworthy and should not be encouraged.”); (“[W]e do not consider that, after a joint trial, an allegation in a motion for a new trial by one co-defendant that the other co-defendant will now testify on his behalf is a sufficient ground for the granting of a new trial.”).
  • State v. Harvey 12 So. 3d 496 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
  • State v. Jacobs 803 So. 2d 933 La. 2001
  • State v. Bright 776 So. 2d 1134 La. 2000
    we stated the general rule that, after a joint trial, an allegation in a motion for a new trial by one co-defendant that the other co-defendant will now testify on his behalf is not a sufficient ground for the granting of a new trial.
  • State v. Rodriguez 761 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Cureaux 736 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Mince 714 So. 2d 684 La. 1998
    see also United States v. Freeman, 77 F.3d 812, 817 (5th Cir.1996) ("When a defendant is aware of a co-defendant's proposed testimony prior to trial, it cannot be deemed newly discovered under [F.R.Crim.P.
  • State v. Hubbard 711 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Jones 657 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Jones 657 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • State v. Spates 588 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Fontenot 578 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Harris 510 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. White 508 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    State v. Humphreys, supra.
  • State v. Brown 479 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Gains 423 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • State v. Wheeler 416 So. 2d 78 La. 1982
    State v. Lawson, 256 La.
  • State v. Goiner 410 So. 2d 1085 La. 1982
  • State v. Williams 398 So. 2d 1112 La. 1981
    State v. Lawson, 256 La.
  • State v. Jernigan 377 So. 2d 1222 La. 1979
  • State v. Key 375 So. 2d 1354 La. 1979
  • State v. Chopin 372 So. 2d 1222 La. 1979
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)
  • State v. Brown 370 So. 2d 547 La. 1979
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)
  • State v. Wilson 366 So. 2d 1328 La. 1978
  • State v. Drew 360 So. 2d 500 La. 1978
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); State v. Perique, *510
  • State v. Stewart 357 So. 2d 1111 La. 1978
  • State v. Tennant 352 So. 2d 629 La. 1977
  • State v. Shivers 346 So. 2d 657 La. 1977
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); State v. Dixon, La., (1976); State v. Cook, La., (1976); State v. Perique, La., (1976); State v. Rogers, La., (1975); State v. Jefferson, La., (1973).
  • State v. De La Beckwith 344 So. 2d 360 La. 1977
    art. 215.1(A); State v. Robinson, No. 58,525, State v. Perique & Merritt
  • State v. Robinson 342 So. 2d 183 La. 1977
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); State v. Perique & Merritt