Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 342 So. 2d 661.

47 citing documents.

Dortch v. Rollins 181 So. 3d 911 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Kilpatrick, supra.
MK International, Inc. v. Central Oil & Supply Corp. 87 So. 3d 165 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Kilpatrick v. Kilpatrick, 27,241 (La.App.2d Cir.8/23/95), , writ denied, 95-2579 (La.12/15/95), .
Biedenharn v. Culp 911 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Suire, supra ; Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Kilpatrick, supra .
Smith v. Dishman & Bennett Speciality Co., Inc. 805 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
2 Cir. 8/23/95), , writ denied, 95-2579 (La.12/15/95), ; Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Picard v. Picard 708 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Floor-N-Wall Distributors, (La.App.
Touro Infirmary v. Marine Medical Unit, Inc. 699 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Kilpatrick v. Kilpatrick 660 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., (La.App.
Richard v. Comeaux 626 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Ville Platte Concrete v. Western Cas.
Ball v. Perkins College Partnership In Commendam 572 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Roy R. Broussard Lumber Yard v. Wilson 560 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Alonzo v. Chifici 526 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Article *242 1846; [7] Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, Executive Recruitment, (La.App.
Woods Realty, Inc. v. Brimberry Trust 521 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company
Cenac v. Cenac 492 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Floor-N-Wall Distributors, (La.App.
Viator v. Bishop 488 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Strecker v. Credico Financial, Inc., (La.App.
Nash v. Nash 486 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Courtesy Ford, Inc. v. Weatherly 485 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Demars v. Luneau Mobile Home Sales, Inc. 479 So. 2d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Taunton v. Cane Air, Inc., (La.App.
Remn Const. Corp. v. Keating 478 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Feazel v. Feazel 471 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Floor-N-Wall Distributors, (La.App.
Percy v. Perkins 468 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Shaw v. Jet America Corp. 462 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Fox v. Don Siebarth Pontiac, Inc. 458 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Strecker v. Credico Financial, Inc. 444 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., B.M.
James M. Vardaman & Co., Inc. v. Ponder 443 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Creely v. Leisure Living, Inc. 437 So. 2d 816 La. 1983
Floor-N-Wall Distributors, Inc. v. Hirts 428 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
art. 2277; Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company
Touchdown Real Estate, Inc. v. Holton 426 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Pearce v. Rogers 423 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Ville Platte Concrete v. Western Cas.
Creely v. Leisure Living, Inc. 423 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
While we recognize that an oral listing agreement is binding, there was simply no showing at trial that the parties ever orally agreed to extend the listing agreement to all sales beyond the five houses enumerated in that agreement.
Whitlock Realty & Construction, Inc. v. Sparks 419 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., (La.
BM Albrecht Elec., Inc. v. Griffin 413 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Green v. Provencal Tie Mill 411 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
However, it is well established that a party claiming the movable under a contract can serve as a credible witness, O’ (La.App.
Miller v. Harvey 408 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Taunton v. Cane Air, Inc. 405 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Ville Platte Concrete Service, Inc. v. Western Cas. & Sur. Co. 399 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Ville Platte Concrete Service, Inc. v. Western Casualty and Surety Company, supra; (La.App.
Arnold v. Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Co. 396 So. 2d 1012 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., (La.App.
Robert J. Naquin & Associates, Inc. v. Portage Plantation, Inc. 394 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
In the case of Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., the court held: “It is well-settled that an agreement listing immovable property for sale with a real estate broker need not be in writing.
Ethridge v. Merchants Trust and Sav. Bank 389 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., (La.
C. J. Brown, Inc. v. Miller 388 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
In Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: “.
VILLE PLATTE CONCRETE SERV., INC. v. Western Cas. & Sur. Co. 377 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
O'ROURKE v. Tracy 375 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
Robert J. Naquin & Associates, Inc. v. Portage Plantation, Inc. 372 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
In the case of Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., the court held: “It is well-settled that an agreement listing immovable property for sale with a real estate broker need not be in writing.
Dickerson v. Hughes 370 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., and cases cited therein.
Young v. Smith 366 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
In the recent case of Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., the court said: “It is well-settled that an agreement listing immovable property for sale with a real estate broker need not be in writing.
Chavers v. Kury Const. Co. 363 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., (La.
Dunaway Realty Co., Inc. v. Pulliam 364 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
While it is well settled that an agreement listing real estate for sale with a real estate broker may be oral or written ( Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, [La.1977]), it is equally well settled that in order for a real estate broker to receive a commission for the sale of property, he must prove an agreement on the part of the person against whom a commission is sought to pay the same.
Cookmeyer v. Cookmeyer 354 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
His testimony was sufficiently corroborated by hers; see Samuels v. Firestone Tire & R. Co., La.1977, .