Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mizell, 341 So. 2d 385.
- State of Louisiana Versus Bobby R. Johnson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
-
State v. Brown
240 So. 3d 284
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In State v. Mizell , (La.
- State v. Ford 976 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
- State v. Spears 940 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
- State v. Love 847 So. 2d 1198 La. 2003
- State v. Peterson 619 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
- State v. Hill 534 So. 2d 1296 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
- State v. Burns 504 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
-
State ex rel. Sterling
441 So. 2d 372
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
The right to compulsory process is the right to demand subpoenas for witnesses and the right to have those subpoenas served — the court observed that “the constitutional right to compulsory process for the attendance of a witness is not to be trifled with.” The record reflects that on January 10, 1983, the defendant, Phyllis Sterling, in proper person requested subpoenas issued “Annie Smith”, “Sharron” and “Deborah Moore” for
- State v. Clark 437 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
-
State v. Latin
412 So. 2d 1357
La. 1982
State v. Dennis, 250 La.
- State v. Batiste 410 So. 2d 1055 La. 1982
-
State v. Mills
390 So. 2d 874
La. 1980
we said: "A return on a subpoena must show what steps have been taken to find an accused's witnesses, what inquiries have been made, from whom, and where those inquiries were made.
- State v. White 389 So. 2d 1300 La. 1980
- State v. Bertrand 381 So. 2d 489 La. 1980
- State v. Hogan 372 So. 2d 1211 La. 1979
- State v. Dickinson 370 So. 2d 557 La. 1979