Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sepulvado, 342 So. 2d 630.

43 citing documents.

State v. Wilkins 131 So. 3d 839 La. 2014
(“Procedural laws relate exclusively to questions of remedy and, in criminal cases, pertain to the method prescribed for the conduct of the prosecution.
State v. Bishop 68 So. 3d 1197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Loyd, 96-1805, pp. 12-13 (La.2/13/97), ; -36 (La.1977), abrogated on other grounds, State ex rel.
State v. Green 957 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Taylor 838 So. 2d 729 La. 2003
Finally, defendant shot and killed his cousin, James, and one Bonita Knighton, after an argument erupted while they, defendant and defendant's wife, were shooting tin cans in a Stonewall junkyard.
State Ex Rel. Olivieri v. State 779 So. 2d 735 La. 2001
alters the situation of a party to his disadvantage is an ex post facto law."); ("An ex post facto law...
Naquin v. Titan Indem. Co. 779 So. 2d 704 La. 2001
Just as an accused is not entitled to be tried in the exact mode prescribed for criminal trials at the time of the commission of the offense for which he is charged, a civil litigant is not entitled to pursue his cause of action in the exact mode prescribed by the legislature at the time his cause of action arose.
State v. Loyd 689 So. 2d 1321 La. 1997
(change in procedural rules made after the commission of the offense, but before trial commenced, may be employed at trial as long as it is not an ex post facto law).
State v. Morgan 686 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
648 (1798)], supra ); ("An ex post facto law ...
State v. Sepulvado 672 So. 2d 158 La. 1996
this court reversed the sentence in light of Roberts v. Louisiana, 428 U.S. 325 , 96 S.Ct.
State Ex Rel. Glover v. State 660 So. 2d 1189 La. 1995
alters the situation of a party to his disadvantage is an ex post facto law.") (quoting Calder v. Bull, supra ); ("An ex post facto law ...
State v. Sorrell 656 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the criteria used to determine whether a law meets the ex post facto prohibition.
State v. Rolen 665 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
2715 , 111 L.Ed.2d 30 (1990)
State v. Hall 648 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
2715 , 111 L.Ed.2d 30 (1990)
State v. Rolen 642 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
2715 , 111 *326 L.Ed.2d 30 (1990)
State v. Davis 614 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Camp 580 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
State v. Hebert 543 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Hodges 526 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Yelverton 515 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
the application of the amended sentencing provision to the defendant appears to effect an impermissible ex post facto application of a later criminal law to the defendant.
State v. Wiley 513 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Bowman 491 So. 2d 1380 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
State v. Nance 469 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Munzy 464 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Odell 458 So. 2d 1304 La. 1984
[2] (1977) the Court considered the question of whether an amendment to La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Floyd 458 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Bennett 454 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
an ex post facto law is defined as follows: An ex post facto law, by definition, is one which is passed after the occurrence of a fact or commission of an act, which retrospectively changes the legal consequences or relations of such fact or deed.
State v. Johnson 443 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Sepulvado, La., (1977) ; State v. Williams, La., (1976) ; State v. McKinnon, La., (1975) .
State v. Huntley 438 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
the Court set forth the criteria utilized in determining whether a law is ex post facto: "The ex post facto prohibition comes into effect when a law makes an act criminal which was innocent when done and punishes such action; or aggravates a crime or makes it greater than when committed; or changes the puni
State v. Metoyer 427 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Parker 423 So. 2d 1121 La. 1982
Richey v. Hunter 407 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
State v. Goods 403 So. 2d 1205 La. 1981
State v. Woods 402 So. 2d 680 La. 1981
State v. Harris 383 So. 2d 1 La. 1980
State v. Wilson 363 So. 2d 481 La. 1978
State v. Sepulvado, La., (1977); State v. Williams, La., (1976); State v. McKinnon, La., (1975).
State v. Carter 362 So. 2d 510 La. 1978
State v. Burge 362 So. 2d 1371 La. 1978
In State v. Sepulvado, La., (1977), we examined the procedural and substantive aspects of statutory law as follows: "Procedural laws relate exclusively to questions of remedy and, in criminal cases, pertain to the method prescribed for the conduct of the prosecution.
State v. Ferguson 358 So. 2d 1214 La. 1978
State v. Williams 358 So. 2d 943 La. 1978
State v. Western 355 So. 2d 1314 La. 1978
State v. Sepulvado, La., (1977).
State v. Williams 355 So. 2d 1291 La. 1978
State v. Gardette 352 So. 2d 212 La. 1977
In State v. Sepulvado, La., (1977), we stated: "Procedural laws relate exclusively to questions of remedy and, in criminal cases, pertain to the method prescribed for the conduct of the prosecution.
State v. Martin 351 So. 2d 92 La. 1977