Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hoffman, 345 So. 2d 1.

26 citing documents.

State v. Green 610 So. 2d 808 La. 1993
State v. Briggs 526 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
4th Cir.1987); reversed on rehearing on other grounds.
State v. Martin 427 So. 2d 1182 La. 1983
State v. Ruffin 403 So. 2d 735 La. 1981
State v. Palrean 395 So. 2d 687 La. 1981
defendants argue that these prior convictions could not be used to enhance their sentences in this case.
State v. Booker 385 So. 2d 1186 La. 1980
State v. Williams 383 So. 2d 996 La. 1980
State v. Holden 375 So. 2d 1372 La. 1979
This court has consistently rejected the argument that the burden is upon the defendant to prove that he did not waive his constitutional rights
State v. Ranker 370 So. 2d 885 La. 1979
“[t]he record must affirmatively show that the accused either was accompanied by counsel or that he was informed of his right to counsel and waived that right, and that the plea was knowingly and intelligently entered.
State v. McGraw 366 So. 2d 1278 La. 1979
No. 9: we held that jury panels in Orleans Parish must be selected indiscriminately and by lot in open court in accordance with C.Cr.P.
State v. Muse 367 So. 2d 789 La. 1979
State v. Lewis 366 So. 2d 1355 La. 1978
State v. Bernard 366 So. 2d 1294 La. 1978
at 4 (La.1977), the defense argued that the records in the cases charged in the habitual offender bill as prior felony convictions were silent as to whether the defendant was advised of his rights under Boykin when he pleaded guilty.
State v. Wilbourn 364 So. 2d 995 La. 1978
State v. Swift 363 So. 2d 499 La. 1978
announced a new method for selecting a jury panel but gave it only prospective application.
State v. Weedon 363 So. 2d 908 La. 1978
See State v. Hoffman, La., (1977).
State v. Kelly 362 So. 2d 1071 La. 1978
recognizes that a majority of the judges of the Criminal District Court for the parish of Orleans selected prospective jurors for voir dire examination in the order in which they appeared on the petit jury venire sheet.
State v. Henderson 362 So. 2d 1358 La. 1978
ARGUMENT NO. 9 (Norris Henderson Assignment No. 2) (Clarence Henderson Assignment No. 1) We have previously determined that Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 784 is applicable to the criminal courts in Orleans Parish, and thus there was error in calling prospective jurors in the order their names appeared on a list submitted by the jury commissioner rather than by lot in open court.
State v. Ferguson 358 So. 2d 1214 La. 1978
State v. Western 355 So. 2d 1314 La. 1978
In State v. Hoffman, La., (on rehearing, 1977), we reversed because this procedure violated Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 784 which requires that the jury panel be drawn indiscriminately and by lot in open court.
State v. Williams 355 So. 2d 1291 La. 1978
State v. Gibbs 355 So. 2d 1299 La. 1978
784 is applicable to the criminal courts in Orleans Parish, and thus there was error in calling prospective jurors in the order their names appeared on a list submitted by the jury commissioner rather than by lot in open court.
State v. Mitchell 356 So. 2d 974 La. 1978
This court stated in State v. Hoffman , on rehearing, : In the instant case, the jury panel was not selected in compliance with La.Code *983 Crim.P.
State v. Nelson 354 So. 2d 546 La. 1978
The petit jury was chosen in open court from prospective jurors, who were called for voir dire in an order determined by lot; however, the drawing by lot itself was not accomplished in open court
State v. Daniels 346 So. 2d 672 La. 1977
Assignment of Error No. 3 In State v. Hoffman, La., , this court held that C.Cr.P.
State v. Patterson 345 So. 2d 1165 La. 1977
In State v. Hoffman, La., (opinion on rehearing rendered April 26, 1977), we sustained a similar objection that this method of calling jurors in the order fixed by out-of-court proceedings violated La.C.Cr.P.