Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 343 So. 2d 705.

25 citing documents.

New Orleans Firefighters Local 632 v. City of New Orleans 876 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Umezulike 843 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
we stated that the test of severability is ‘whether or not the legislature would have passed the statute had it been presented with the invalid features removed.’ 343 So.2d at 708 , quoting 2 Sutherland, Statutes & Statutory Construction, § 44.04 (Sands 4th ed.1973)....
Byers v. Edmondson 826 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Brenan 772 So. 2d 64 La. 2000
Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 1 738 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Foster v. Fowler 652 So. 2d 993 La. 1995
24:175; Gaudet v. Economical Super Market, 237 La.
State v. Cinel 646 So. 2d 309 La. 1994
we stated that the test of severability is "whether or not the legislature would have passed the statute had it been presented with the invalid features removed."
State in Interest of AC 643 So. 2d 719 La. 1994
See Lauga, supra; and Gaudet v. Economical Super Market, 237 La.
Succession of Lauga 624 So. 2d 1156 La. 1993
Polk v. Edwards 626 So. 2d 1128 La. 1993
State v. Russland Enterprises 555 So. 2d 1365 La. 1990
State v. Russland Enterprises 548 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Freeman 544 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Concerned Bus. & Prop. Owners of DeSoto, Inc. v. DeSoto Parish School Bd. 531 So. 2d 436 La. 1988
The two jurisprudential tests, viz., whether the legislature would have passed the statute had it been presented with the invalid features removed, and whether the general object of the act can be achieved without the invalid part, -09 (La.1977); -48 (La.1976), also have been met.
State v. Green 493 So. 2d 588 La. 1986
v. Civil Service Commission, *592 (La.1982); (La.
State v. Louisiana Toy Co., Inc. 483 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Clark 467 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. LeCompte, supra
New Orleans, Etc. v. Civ. Service, Etc. 422 So. 2d 402 La. 1982
State v. LeCompte 406 So. 2d 1300 La. 1981
State v. Fuller 377 So. 2d 335 La. 1979
State v. Payton 361 So. 2d 866 La. 1978
State v. Wrestle, Inc. 360 So. 2d 831 La. 1978
Without discussion of the obvious reasons, we conclude that there is a rational basis for such differentiation reasonably related to a valid governmental purpose, unlike the unconstitutional (irrational) between one class of employees and another.
State v. Luck 353 So. 2d 225 La. 1977
State v. Terrebonne 344 So. 2d 1010 La. 1977
However, due to the decision of this court in State v. Johnson, No. 58495, consolidated with State v. Hensley, No. 53496, it is unnecessary to determine whether the errors assigned have merit as the *1011 defendant’s conviction and sentence must be reversed.
State v. Amato 343 So. 2d 698 La. 1977
Today in State v. Johnson, docket numbers 58,495 and 58,496, we held that although the portion of La.R.S.