Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Elzie, 343 So. 2d 712.

86 citing documents.

State v. McIntyre 544 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
a case very similar to the instant case, the defendant had been convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute.
State v. Tyler 544 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Thomas 543 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Myre 502 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Hills 498 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Jordan 489 So. 2d 994 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Brown 479 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
The circumstantial evidence considered includes the quantity of the illegal drug and the circumstances of its possession
State v. London 478 So. 2d 1340 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Allen, [ 129 La.
State v. Williams 464 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Butler 462 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Allen, [ 129 La.
State v. Harvey 463 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
State v. Williams 457 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Scott 451 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Pettaway 450 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Connors 432 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
In State v. Elzie, La., (1977), we stated: "In summary, specific intent is present when from the circumstances the offender must have subjectively desired the prohibited result.
State v. Staton 433 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
The circumstantial evidence considered includes the quantity of the illegal drug and the circumstances of its possession
State v. Simmons 443 So. 2d 512 La. 1983
[7] *522 this court found that "general intent exists when from the circumstances the prohibited result may reasonably be expected to follow from the offender's voluntary act, irrespective of any subjective desire on his part to have accomplished such result."
State v. Kinney 431 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
and cases cited therein.
State v. Trahan 425 So. 2d 1222 La. 1983
State v. Greenway 422 So. 2d 1146 La. 1982
State v. Fuller 414 So. 2d 306 La. 1982
State v. Ramoin 410 So. 2d 1010 La. 1982
the State "simply proved that the defendant possessed less than 7/10th of an ounce of a substance containing one percent of cocaine," or about 7/thousandths of an ounce of cocaine.
State v. Goiner 410 So. 2d 1085 La. 1982
State v. McDermitt 406 So. 2d 195 La. 1981
State v. Gould 395 So. 2d 647 La. 1981
State v. Williams 389 So. 2d 384 La. 1980
State v. Holmes 388 So. 2d 722 La. 1980
State v. Mathews 375 So. 2d 1165 La. 1979
See: and decisions therein cited.
State v. Davis 371 So. 2d 788 La. 1979
State v. Johnson 368 So. 2d 719 La. 1979
(possession of a controlled dangerous substance with an intent to distribute).
State v. Carter 363 So. 2d 893 La. 1978
The defendants, relying upon State v. Elzie, La., (1977), argue there was no showing of specific intent.
State v. Lindinger 357 So. 2d 500 La. 1978
State v. Dardar 353 So. 2d 713 La. 1977
In State v. Elzie, La., (1977), we stated: "In summary, specific intent is present when from the circumstances the offender must have subjectively desired the prohibited *716 result.
State v. Penson 351 So. 2d 1181 La. 1977
State v. 1971 Green GMC Van 354 So. 2d 479 La. 1977
State v. Schwander 345 So. 2d 1173 La. 1977