Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Amos, 343 So. 2d 166.

31 citing documents.

State v. Johnson 266 So. 3d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
"[W]e conclude the right to bear arms was always fundamental; the amendment to the constitutional provision merely sought to ensure that the review standard of an alleged infringement of this fundamental right was in keeping with the refinements made to constitutional analysis which developed since our decision in [ State v. Amos , (La.
State v. Fletcher 238 So. 3d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Amos , at 168 (La.1977).
State v. Zeno 155 So. 3d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The 2012 amendment to Article I, Section 11
State v. Dixon 146 So. 3d 662 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2014
State v. Eberhardt 145 So. 3d 377 La. 2014
STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JAMAL C. TAYLOR AND KELIN A. STEVENS (Parish of Jefferson) STATE OF LOUISIANA v. … La. 2014
State v. Wiggins 139 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Draughter 130 So. 3d 855 La. 2013
the defendants were charged with violating La R.S.
State v. Glover 997 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Baker 970 So. 2d 948 La. 2008
Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corp. 785 So. 2d 1 La. 2001
See State v. Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.9/5/96)
State v. Derouin 778 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
State v. Blanchard 776 So. 2d 1165 La. 2001
(holding that "it is reasonable for the legislature in the interest of public welfare and safety to regulate the possession of firearms for a limited period of time by citizens who have committed certain specified serious felonies"); and State v. Haml
State v. West 754 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the restoration of "all rights of citizenship" upon completion of supervision following a felony conviction did not include the right to possess firearms in contravention of LSA-R.S.
State v. President 715 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
found the policy reason and purpose for enactment of La.R.S.
State v. Riser 704 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Sandifer 679 So. 2d 1324 La. 1996
State v. Hamlin 497 So. 2d 1369 La. 1986
and authorities cited therein.
State v. Jones 492 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Blache 480 So. 2d 304 La. 1985
State v. Young 472 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Wilson 454 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
‘Its purpose is to limit the possession of firearms by persons who, by their past commission of certain specified serious felonies, have demonstrated a dangerous disregard for the law and present a potential threat of further or future criminal activity.’ at 168 (La.1977).
State v. Bell 439 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
State v. Wiggins 432 So. 2d 234 La. 1983
*236 defendants argued that, having been restored "[f]ull rights of citizenship" upon completion of state supervision for their previous felony convictions under La.
State v. Cobb 428 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Mose 412 So. 2d 584 La. 1982
State v. Hathaway 411 So. 2d 1074 La. 1982
State v. Williams 392 So. 2d 448 La. 1980
State v. Clement 368 So. 2d 1037 La. 1979
such differentiation is not impermissible: "We are satisfied that it is reasonable for the legislature in the interest of public welfare and safety to regulate the possession of firearms for a limited period of time by citizens who have committed certain specified serious felonies.
State v. Sanders 357 So. 2d 492 La. 1978
State v. Williams 358 So. 2d 943 La. 1978