Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Matte, 346 So. 2d 1345.

18 citing documents.

Jenkins v. Mangano Corp. 774 So. 2d 101 La. 2000
841 (1930) (statements by the alleged father acknowledging Ethel Casson as his child at various times to various parties constituted acknowledgment); (La.App.
Bolden v. Rodgers 746 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
Sudwischer v. Estate of Huffpauir 705 So. 2d 724 La. 1997
841 (1930) (statements by the alleged father acknowledging Ethel Casson as his child at various times to various parties constituted acknowledgment); (La.App.
Santiny ex rel. Santiny v. Pitre 591 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Chatelain v. State of Louisiana, DOTD, (La.App.
Chatelain v. STATE, DOTD 586 So. 2d 1373 La. 1991
841 (1930) (statements by the alleged father acknowledging Ethel Casson as his child at various times to various parties constituted acknowledgment); (La.App.
Talley v. Stuckey 560 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
State ex rel. Department of Health and Human Resources v. Hinton 515 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
In the Essex decision the court quoted from (La.App.
STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HHR v. Hinton 515 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
In the Essex decision the court quoted from (La.App.
George v. Breaux 486 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Appellant relys primarily on two cases to support his claim of avowal of paternity: and
LeBlanc v. LeBlanc 486 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
conclude that in order for private ac-knowledgements in conversation to be sufficient to prove paternity these informal acknowledgments must be of a continuous, habitual and unequivocal nature; that is, of a sufficient frequency that there can be little doubt that the alleged father truly believes himself to be the father of the child ...” See also State v. Jefferson, supra; (La.App.
STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCES v. Williams 471 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
3rd Cir.1984) this court cited (La.App.
Thomas v. Smith 463 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Jefferson 448 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
In the Matter of Succession of Levy 428 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State Through H. & H. Resources Admin. v. Essex 427 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
IMC Exploration Co. v. Henderson 419 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Quiett v. Estate of Moore 378 So. 2d 362 La. 1980
Succession of Matte 346 So. 2d 1351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
For the reasons stated in the companion case of , in which a separate decision is being rendered by us this date, the judgment of the district court in the present case is affirmed.