DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bennett, 345 So. 2d 1129.

152 citing documents.

  • State v. Franks 975 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Bridgewater, supra
  • State v. Strain 972 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    and State v. Snyder, 98-1078 (La.4/14/99), , opinion after remand, 98-1078 (La.4/14/04), , cert.
  • State v. Miller 964 So. 2d 911 La. 2007
  • State, in Interest of Dj 959 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Dupree 950 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the considerations necessary in determining whether a defendant is fully aware of the proceedings against him: *149 The decision as to a defendant's competency to stand trial should not turn solely upon whether he suffers from a mental disease or defect, but must
  • State v. Rankin 938 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the considerations necessary in determining whether a defendant is fully aware of the proceedings against him: The decision as to a defendant's competency to stand trial should not turn solely upon whether he suffers from a mental disease or defect, but must be ma
  • State v. Ford 930 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Lee 930 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    The Bennett factors are derived from the Supreme Court’s
  • State v. Swain 900 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the considerations necessary to determining whether a defendant is fully aware of the proceedings against him: The decision as to a defendant's competency to stand trial should not turn solely upon whether he suffers from a mental disease or defect, but must be ma
  • State v. Snyder 874 So. 2d 739 La. 2004
    During their examination of the defendant, the doctors performed the standard tests used to determine legal competency, or competency to stand trial ( (on rehearing)).
  • State v. Williams 866 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    the Louisiana Supreme Court listed the following factors to be considered in determining whether a defendant is able to assist in his defense: [W]hether he is able to recall and relate facts pertaining to his actions and whereabouts at certain times; whether he is able to assist counsel in locating an
  • Explained State v. Carmouche 872 So. 2d 1020 La. 2003
    Doctors McManus and Benoit each rendered a (on rehearing).
  • State v. MacCracken 845 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    |fiIn the lead case on mental capacity, on reh’g, the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed factors to be considered in determining whether the accused is aware of the nature of the proceedings against him and his ability to assist in his defense: *1109 Appropriate considerations in determining whether the accused is fu
  • State v. Raiford 846 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    criteria for competency to proceed, the defendant was competent to proceed and assist counsel, although he demonstrated difficulty with processing information quickly enough to keep up with the pace of a trial.
  • State v. Orange 845 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    896, 903 , 43 L.Ed.2d 103 (1975); (on rehearing).
  • State v. Williams 831 So. 2d 835 La. 2002
    See State v. Snyder, 98-1078, p. 26 (La.4/14/99), , (La.
  • State v. Dunn 831 So. 2d 862 La. 2002
    See State v. Snyder, 98-1078, p. 26 (La.4/14/99)
  • State Ex Rel. Seals v. State 831 So. 2d 828 La. 2002
  • State v. Pugh 831 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    896 , 43 L.Ed.2d 103 (1975)
  • State v. Moore 827 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    896 , 43 L.Ed.2d 103 (1975)
  • State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
    896 , 43 L.Ed.2d 103 (1975)
  • State v. Sullivan 817 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    In the lead case on mental capacity, State v. Bennett , on reh'g, the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed factors to be considered in determining whether the accused is aware of the nature of the proceedings against him and his ability to assist in his defense: Appropriate considerations in determining whether the accused is fully aware of the nature of the proceeding
  • State v. Bell 796 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    (citations omitted), stated: The decision as to a defendant’s competency to stand trial should not turn solely upon whether he suffers from a mental disease or defect, but must be made with specific reference to the nature of the charge, the complexity of the case and the gravity of the decisions with
  • State v. Dorsey 796 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    220 , 145 L.Ed.2d 185 (1999)
  • State v. Algere 780 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    896 , 43 L.Ed.2d 103 (1975)
  • State v. Breaux 767 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Frank 758 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    See also State v. Snyder, 98-1078 (La.4/14/99)
  • State v. Hernandez 735 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    896 , 43 L.Ed.2d 103 (1975)
  • State v. Howard 751 So. 2d 783 La. 1999
    896 , 43 L.Ed.2d 103 (1975)
  • State v. Snyder 750 So. 2d 832 La. 1999
    (on rehearing), "[T]he trial court may not rely so extensively upon medical testimony as to commit the ultimate decision of competency to the physician."
  • State v. Castleberry 758 So. 2d 749 La. 1999
    we enunciated a number of factors that should be considered in deciding whether an accused is competent to stand trial: Appropriate considerations in determining whether the accused is fully aware of the nature of the proceedings include: whether he understands the nature of the charge and can appreciate hi
  • State v. Picot 718 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    896 , 43 L.Ed.2d 103 (1975); State v. Silva, 96-0407 p.7, 699 So.2d at 490-491 .
  • State v. Evans 715 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    896, 43 L.Ed.2d 103 (1975)
  • State v. Armant 719 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    896 , 43 L.Ed.2d 103 (1975); (1977).
  • State v. Campbell 715 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    where the court noted appropriate considerations for determining whether a defendant is fully aware of the nature of the proceedings and is able to assist in his defense.
  • State v. Burmaster 710 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    He alleges three additional assignments of error: 1) that his due process was violated when the trial court required him to prove his incompetency to stand trial by a higher standard of proof than required by the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States; 2) in finding him competent to stand trial; and 3) that his counsel was ineffective in failing to object to the trial court's ruling finding him competent.
  • State v. Gaines 701 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
  • State v. Silva 699 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    896 , 43 L.Ed.2d 103 (1975)
  • State v. Jackson 707 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    For a discussion of the appropriate considerations in determining competency
  • State v. Wilson 679 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Lott 671 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    State v. Brooks, supra ; State v. Narcisse, supra ; (La.App.
  • State v. Dixon 668 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    *392 the Court set forth factors which the trial court must take into consideration when determining whether a defendant is competent to proceed: Appropriate considerations in determining whether the accused is fully aware of the nature of the proceedings include: whether he understands the nature of the c
  • State v. Thibodeaux 647 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Dugar 643 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Howard 635 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Clark 638 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    where it did not require a complete reversal.
  • State v. Green 632 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    the Court set forth factors which the trial court must take into consideration when determining whether a defendant is competent to proceed: Appropriate considerations in determining whether the accused is fully aware of the nature of the proceedings include: whether he understands the nature of the c
  • Distinguished State v. Nomey 613 So. 2d 157 La. 1993
    [8] The present case is distinguishable from a (La.
  • State v. Perry 610 So. 2d 746 La. 1992
    Perry argues that a are implicit in the mental standard to undergo execution.
  • State v. Jackson 600 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    the Court set forth factors which the trial court must take into consideration when determining whether a defendant is competent to proceed to trial: Appropriate considerations in determining whether the accused is fully aware of the nature of the proceedings include: whether he understands the nature