Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lovett, 345 So. 2d 1139.

18 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Deangelo Whitaker La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State v. Dennis 72 So. 3d 968 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
See, State v. Mack, 43,206 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Aaron W. Ardoin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Ardoin 58 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. MacK 981 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
1974), [2] the defendant complained that his indictment was substantially defective because it was not endorsed by the foreman of the grand jury.
State v. Morris 882 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Langley 711 So. 2d 651 La. 1998
State v. Kimble 546 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
1974), in which the defendant's allegation that an inculpatory statement was elicited from him without a recitation of Miranda rights was rejected on the basis that the defendant had been properly advised of his Miranda rights on the preceding day.
State v. Jackson 523 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Nunnery 482 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
1025 , 59 L.Ed.2d 77 (1979) (held not applicable) (held not applicable); (held applicable); State v. Beer, 252 La.
State v. Mitchell 421 So. 2d 851 La. 1982
State v. Harvill 403 So. 2d 706 La. 1981
State v. Dison 396 So. 2d 1254 La. 1981
State v. Toomer 395 So. 2d 1320 La. 1981
ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 12
State v. Day 391 So. 2d 1147 La. 1980
State v. Manning 376 So. 2d 95 La. 1979
Pugh, Louisiana Evidence Law, 279-89 (1974).
State v. Lukefahr 363 So. 2d 661 La. 1978
Corpus Christi Parish Credit Union v. Martin 358 So. 2d 295 La. 1978