Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 340 So. 2d 1382.

28 citing documents.

  • State v. Young 663 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Vail 571 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    See Justice Tate's concurring opinion, -1389 (La.1976).
  • State v. Coates 509 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    Prior to Cox , the contemporaneous objection rule was applied post-verdict to polling of a jury, a motion for a new trial, a presentence investigation, [3] and excessive sentences, and their progeny.
  • State v. Johnson 459 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    ( the Louisiana Supreme Court held that entering of a valid guilty plea does not waive post-plea errors.
  • State v. Lewis 430 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Washington 406 So. 2d 191 La. 1981
  • State v. McKinney 406 So. 2d 160 La. 1981
    rehearing denied October 15, 1976; rehearing denied January 21, 1977.
  • State v. Washington 406 So. 2d 191 La. 1981
    This court stated that “[ujnder the circumstances we believe there was no necessity for listing enumerated reasons and that defendant cannot complain of excessive length.” See Dixon, C. J.
  • State v. Curry 400 So. 2d 614 La. 1981
  • State v. Goode 380 So. 2d 1361 La. 1980
    In a concurring opinion (by Justice Tate) it was noted that the Louisiana prohibition against excessive punishment was intended to prohibit a level of punishment out of proportion with the offense.
  • Overruled State v. Terriault 369 So. 2d 125 La. 1979
  • State v. Cox 369 So. 2d 118 La. 1979
  • State v. Sepulvado 367 So. 2d 762 La. 1979
    -87 (La.1977) (concurring opinion).
  • State v. Mallery 364 So. 2d 1283 La. 1978
  • State v. Sykes 364 So. 2d 1293 La. 1978
  • State v. Lukefahr 363 So. 2d 661 La. 1978
  • State v. Kemp 359 So. 2d 978 La. 1978
    (1977), and cases cited therein.
  • State v. Berain 360 So. 2d 822 La. 1978
    See State v. Williams, La., (1977), and cases cited therein.
  • State v. Aguillard 357 So. 2d 535 La. 1978
  • State v. Johnson 354 So. 2d 1036 La. 1978
  • State v. Proctor 354 So. 2d 488 La. 1977
    841, 920; (concurring opinion).
  • State v. Underwood 353 So. 2d 1013 La. 1977
  • State v. Dickerson 353 So. 2d 262 La. 1977
  • State v. Anderson 352 So. 2d 1019 La. 1977
  • State v. Progue 350 So. 2d 1181 La. 1977
    (concurring opinion) (1976).
  • State v. Norris 347 So. 2d 225 La. 1977
  • State v. Milby 345 So. 2d 18 La. 1977
    Assuming that excessiveness is (as some members of the court have indicated) a ground for appellate review, we cannot say that a life sentence for (what the jury found to be) the intentional murder of another human being is excessive, when the jury rejected factual defenses of intoxication and insanity.
  • State v. Frank 344 So. 2d 1039 La. 1977
    of 1974, Article 1, Section 20