Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 340 So. 2d 1382.
- State v. Young 663 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
-
State v. Vail
571 So. 2d 710
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
See Justice Tate's concurring opinion, -1389 (La.1976).
-
State v. Coates
509 So. 2d 438
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Prior to Cox , the contemporaneous objection rule was applied post-verdict to polling of a jury, a motion for a new trial, a presentence investigation, [3] and excessive sentences, and their progeny.
-
State v. Johnson
459 So. 2d 1316
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
( the Louisiana Supreme Court held that entering of a valid guilty plea does not waive post-plea errors.
- State v. Lewis 430 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Washington 406 So. 2d 191 La. 1981
-
State v. McKinney
406 So. 2d 160
La. 1981
rehearing denied October 15, 1976; rehearing denied January 21, 1977.
-
State v. Washington
406 So. 2d 191
La. 1981
This court stated that “[ujnder the circumstances we believe there was no necessity for listing enumerated reasons and that defendant cannot complain of excessive length.” See Dixon, C. J.
- State v. Curry 400 So. 2d 614 La. 1981
-
State v. Goode
380 So. 2d 1361
La. 1980
In a concurring opinion (by Justice Tate) it was noted that the Louisiana prohibition against excessive punishment was intended to prohibit a level of punishment out of proportion with the offense.
- Overruled State v. Terriault 369 So. 2d 125 La. 1979
- State v. Cox 369 So. 2d 118 La. 1979
-
State v. Sepulvado
367 So. 2d 762
La. 1979
-87 (La.1977) (concurring opinion).
- State v. Mallery 364 So. 2d 1283 La. 1978
- State v. Sykes 364 So. 2d 1293 La. 1978
- State v. Lukefahr 363 So. 2d 661 La. 1978
-
State v. Kemp
359 So. 2d 978
La. 1978
(1977), and cases cited therein.
-
State v. Berain
360 So. 2d 822
La. 1978
See State v. Williams, La., (1977), and cases cited therein.
- State v. Aguillard 357 So. 2d 535 La. 1978
- State v. Johnson 354 So. 2d 1036 La. 1978
-
State v. Proctor
354 So. 2d 488
La. 1977
841, 920; (concurring opinion).
- State v. Underwood 353 So. 2d 1013 La. 1977
- State v. Dickerson 353 So. 2d 262 La. 1977
- State v. Anderson 352 So. 2d 1019 La. 1977
-
State v. Progue
350 So. 2d 1181
La. 1977
(concurring opinion) (1976).
- State v. Norris 347 So. 2d 225 La. 1977
-
State v. Milby
345 So. 2d 18
La. 1977
Assuming that excessiveness is (as some members of the court have indicated) a ground for appellate review, we cannot say that a life sentence for (what the jury found to be) the intentional murder of another human being is excessive, when the jury rejected factual defenses of intoxication and insanity.
-
State v. Frank
344 So. 2d 1039
La. 1977
of 1974, Article 1, Section 20