Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Linkletter, 345 So. 2d 452.

55 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Anthony Scott Tubbs La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
State v. Do 208 So. 3d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Briley 151 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The Ward Court also recognized that “[t]o refuse to grant a new trial on such a basis is not an abuse of discretion” because “[a] recantation at a new trial is a confession to |22perjury which destroys the credibility of the witness.” State v. Ward, 542 So.2d at 739 ().
State v. Quang T. Do 130 So. 3d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Otero 3 So. 3d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
See, e.g., State v. Linkletter, 77-58596 (La.04/11/77), .
State v. White 850 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Walker 789 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. MacKey 687 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Guidry 647 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Valrie 597 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
certiorari denied, 434 U.S. 1016 , 98 S.Ct.
State v. Wright 598 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
3d Cir.1988), writ den., State v. Tyler, supra, 342 So.2d at 588 ; cert.
State v. Taylor 553 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Ward 542 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State ex rel. Jolla v. Butler 538 So. 2d 583 La. 1989
State ex rel. West v. Saia 532 So. 2d 170 La. 1988
State v. Ealy 530 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Hodges 526 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Gray 526 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Smith 520 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
State v. Spell, supra ; cert.
State v. Alexis 514 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
cert denied Linkletter v. Louisiana, 434 U.S. 1016 , 98 S.Ct.
State v. Green 505 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
To determine the existence of probable cause, the court must examine the “ ‘facts and circumstances within the arresting officer’s knowledge, and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information;’ ” and do so in light of the experience of reasonable people, not legal technicians.
State v. Mouton 503 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
2011 , 72 L.Ed.2d 467 (1982); cert.
State v. Reynolds 473 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Spell, supra ; (La.
State v. Pautard 470 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State Ex Rel. Martin v. State 462 So. 2d 637 La. 1985
State v. Cody 446 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Mitchell 443 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Ruffin 434 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Montgomery 432 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Webb 432 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
rehearing denied 1977, cert.
State v. Davis 431 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Clayton 427 So. 2d 827 La. 1983
State Ex Rel. Becnel v. Blackburn 410 So. 2d 1015 La. 1982
State v. Edwards 406 So. 2d 1331 La. 1981
at 456 (La.1977); But see Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 , 100 S.Ct.
State v. Spell 399 So. 2d 551 La. 1981
State v. McDonald 387 So. 2d 1116 La. 1980
State in Interest of Lewis 386 So. 2d 1079 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
To determine the existence of probable cause, the court must examine the ` "facts and circumstances within the arresting officer's knowledge, and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information;"' (La.
State in Interest of Giangrosso 385 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
the Court said: "On a number of occasions this Court has made clear that the decision in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct.
State ex rel. Brown v. Becker 377 So. 2d 1242 La. 1979
State v. Billiot 370 So. 2d 539 La. 1979
To determine the existence of probable cause, the court must examine the "`facts and circumstances within the arresting officer's knowledge, and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information;'" and do so in light of the experience of reasonable people, not legal technicians.
State Ex Rel. Fields v. Maggio 368 So. 2d 1016 La. 1979
State v. Turner 365 So. 2d 1352 La. 1978
State v. Boyd 359 So. 2d 931 La. 1978
This court has generally held that a pretrial in-camera inspection of the state's file is not required; see, e. g., State v. Ranker, 263 La.
State v. Gipson 359 So. 2d 87 La. 1978
State v. King 355 So. 2d 1305 La. 1978
State v. Cass 356 So. 2d 936 La. 1977
Kyle v. City of New Orleans 353 So. 2d 969 La. 1977
State v. Phillips, La., (1977); State v. Linkletter, La., (1977); State v. Johnson, 249 La.
State v. Holmes 354 So. 2d 1282 La. 1977
and State v. Johnson, 249 La.
State v. Williams 353 So. 2d 1299 La. 1977
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)