Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lavene, 343 So. 2d 185.
-
State v. East
768 So. 2d 173
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
[8] State v. Wiley (La.App.
-
State v. Haygood
641 So. 2d 1074
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Art. 844, Comment (c); State v. Gene, supra .
- State v. Galliano 639 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- State v. Wiley 614 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
-
State v. Conway
588 So. 2d 1369
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
844, 916(1) and (5), and 920 and Comment (b)
-
State v. Gene
587 So. 2d 18
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
844, 916(1) and (5), and 920 and Comment (b)
-
State v. Gene
587 So. 2d 18
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
844, 916(1) and (5), and 920 and Comment (b)
- State v. Trahan 543 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- State v. Guidry 524 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
- State v. Delatte 506 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Toussaint 502 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
-
State v. Taylor
483 So. 2d 232
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
at 188 (La.1977) provides: “The newly discovered evidence should be of a nature that, ‘if the evidence had been introduced at the trial it would probably have changed the verdict or judgment of guilty.’ La.C.Cr.P.
- State v. Calloway 458 So. 2d 469 La. 1984
- State v. Hall 454 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
-
State v. Kelly
453 So. 2d 641
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
the Louisiana Supreme Court held: “[Assignments of error are designations in writing of the errors to be urged on appeal and are to be filed with the trial court, which may submit per curiam comments.
-
State v. Smith
452 So. 2d 251
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
5th Cir.1984)] or briefed, but not lodged in the trial court [ (La.
-
State v. Laddin
449 So. 2d 691
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Art. 894.-1.” the Louisiana Supreme Court held: “[assignments of error are designations in writing of the errors to be urged on appeal and are to be filed with the trial court, which may submit per curiam comments.
-
State v. Ramsey
450 So. 2d 660
La. 1984
“The remedy against any delay of appointed or retained counsel in preparing and filing assignments of error may be discipline of dilatory counsel; it is not denial of appellate review to his client because of his delay.” at 187 (La.1977).
-
State v. Bridges
444 So. 2d 721
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated, "[a]ssignments of error are designations in writing of the errors to be urged on appeal and are to be filed with the trial court, which may submit per curiam comments.
- City of Monroe v. Robinson 423 So. 2d 1163 La. 1982