Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lavene, 343 So. 2d 185.

20 citing documents.

  • State v. East 768 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    [8] State v. Wiley (La.App.
  • State v. Haygood 641 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    Art. 844, Comment (c); State v. Gene, supra .
  • State v. Galliano 639 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Wiley 614 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Conway 588 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    844, 916(1) and (5), and 920 and Comment (b)
  • State v. Gene 587 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    844, 916(1) and (5), and 920 and Comment (b)
  • State v. Gene 587 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    844, 916(1) and (5), and 920 and Comment (b)
  • State v. Trahan 543 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Guidry 524 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Delatte 506 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Toussaint 502 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Taylor 483 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    at 188 (La.1977) provides: “The newly discovered evidence should be of a nature that, ‘if the evidence had been introduced at the trial it would probably have changed the verdict or judgment of guilty.’ La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Calloway 458 So. 2d 469 La. 1984
  • State v. Hall 454 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Kelly 453 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held: “[Assignments of error are designations in writing of the errors to be urged on appeal and are to be filed with the trial court, which may submit per curiam comments.
  • State v. Smith 452 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    5th Cir.1984)] or briefed, but not lodged in the trial court [ (La.
  • State v. Laddin 449 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Art. 894.-1.” the Louisiana Supreme Court held: “[assignments of error are designations in writing of the errors to be urged on appeal and are to be filed with the trial court, which may submit per curiam comments.
  • State v. Ramsey 450 So. 2d 660 La. 1984
    “The remedy against any delay of appointed or retained counsel in preparing and filing assignments of error may be discipline of dilatory counsel; it is not denial of appellate review to his client because of his delay.” at 187 (La.1977).
  • State v. Bridges 444 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated, "[a]ssignments of error are designations in writing of the errors to be urged on appeal and are to be filed with the trial court, which may submit per curiam comments.
  • City of Monroe v. Robinson 423 So. 2d 1163 La. 1982