Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Adcock v. Surety Research & Inv. Corp., 344 So. 2d 969.
-
Babcock & Wilcox v. Babcock Mexico
597 So. 2d 110
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
In Adcock v. Surety Research & Investment Corp., the Court allowed the exercise of personal jurisdiction over a California corporation whose president had made one trip to Louisiana, during which he had negotiated and executed a contract concerning a construction project in Nevada.
-
De Reyes v. Marine Mgt. and Consulting
586 So. 2d 103
La. 1991
See Superior Supply Co. v. Associated Pipe & Supply Co., (La.
- Gillespie v. Bynum 508 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
- National Oil & Gas Co. of Florida v. Teel 493 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- Courtesy Ford, Inc. v. Weatherly 485 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- Trahan v. Manco Products, Inc. 479 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- Walker v. Over the Road Trucking, Inc. 481 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
-
Delaunay v. Mobile Telephone of South Central Louisiana
477 So. 2d 802
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
the Court said: “The applicable statutory provision was designed to allow the courts of this state to exercise the broadest basis of personal jurisdiction over non-residents permissible under the fourteenth amendment.
- Stevens v. Stevens 476 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- Alba v. Pyramid Island Ltd. 474 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
- Severn South Partnership v. Kearney 465 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- Galle v. Allstate Ins. Co. 451 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- Hervish v. Growables, Inc. 449 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- US Fidelity v. Hi-Tower Concrete Pumping 434 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
-
Stuckey v. Stuckey
434 So. 2d 513
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Quasha v. Shale Development Corp., supra
- Green v. Luxury Auto Rentals, Ltd. 422 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
Buckbee on Behalf of Buckbee v. Aweco, Inc.
418 So. 2d 698
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Corp., stated: "The issue of the applicability of La.
- Sistrunk v. Sun Oil Co. 417 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Hall v. Scott 416 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Heinberg v. Poole 413 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
- Jones v. MFA Mut. Ins. Co. 398 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
- Clay v. Clay 389 So. 2d 31 La. 1980
-
Thibodeaux v. King-Wilkinson, Inc.
386 So. 2d 189
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Corp., presents an interesting comparison of what facts are sufficient for minimum contacts for the purpose of the Long Arm Statute and due process requirements.
- Soileau v. Evangeline Farmer's Co-Op 386 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
-
Sidney Fabre & Son Seafood Co. v. Johnson Seafood Canning Co.
376 So. 2d 596
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Corp., and Drilling Eng.
- Latham v. Ryan 373 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
- Ingram Contractors, Inc. v. Rowley 360 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978