Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of Monroe v. French, 345 So. 2d 23.

30 citing documents.

State v. Ostrom 980 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
me court in Carlos , made the following observation about certain mixed expressions in the court’s former rulings on multiple-offense DWI: We note that prior jurisprudence from this Court has deemed predicate convictions used in multiple offender DWI prosecutions as both “essential ele *897 ments” of the offense that must be proved by the State beyond a reasonable doubt, and as essential averments that do not constitute a “material ingredient” of the crime, State v. Montgomery, 250 La.
State v. Watson 911 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Hargrove 886 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Broussard 819 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Hight 810 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Carlos 738 So. 2d 556 La. 1999
We note that prior jurisprudence from this Court has deemed predicate convictions used in multiple offender DWI prosecutions as both "essential elements" of the offense that must be proved by the State beyond a reasonable doubt, (La.
State v. Franks 730 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Inzina 728 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Powell 677 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Metoyer 612 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
State v. Payne 586 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
State v. Mobley 568 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Pitre 532 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "In Louisiana, proof that a person of the same name has been previously convicted does not constitute prima facie evidence that the two persons are the same.
State v. Pitre 532 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: “In Louisiana, proof that a person of the same name has been previously convicted does not constitute prima facie evidence that the two persons are the same.
State v. Brown 514 So. 2d 99 La. 1987
State v. Ayres 509 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Brian 502 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
as requiring the state to prove that the person named in the minute entry was the same person as the defendant on trial.
State v. Washington 498 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
State v. Washington 498 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Brown 496 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Savoy 487 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "In Louisiana, proof that a person of the same name has been previously convicted does not constitute prima facie evidence that the two persons are the same.
State v. Franklin 461 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
City of Monroe v. French, La., (1977).
State v. Krause 405 So. 2d 832 La. 1981
State v. Westbrook 392 So. 2d 1043 La. 1980
conviction because sufficient connexity was not shown between him and the prior offender
State v. Byrd 385 So. 2d 248 La. 1980
we held that when the sole evidence supporting an essential element of the offense is ultimately determined on review to be inadmissible, the defendant should be retried on competent evidence rather than discharged.
State v. Hamilton 356 So. 2d 1360 La. 1978
: "In Louisiana, proof that a person of the same name has been previously convicted does not constitute prima facie evidence that the two persons are the same.
State v. Tillman 356 So. 2d 1376 La. 1978
State v. Adams 355 So. 2d 917 La. 1978
: "In Louisiana, proof that a person of the same name has been previously convicted does not constitute prima facie evidence that the two persons are the same.
State v. Neal 347 So. 2d 1139 La. 1977
City of Monroe v. French, La., (1977).
State v. Francis 345 So. 2d 1120 La. 1977
(rendered April 11, 1977).