Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fearn, 345 So. 2d 468.
-
State of Louisiana v. Rickey D. Arvie
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
2022, 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
-
State v. Arvie
73 So. 3d 516
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
-
State v. Shed
828 So. 2d 124
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Braud, supra; State v. Williams, supra
-
State v. Shed
828 So. 2d 124
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Braud, supra; State v. Williams, supra ; (La.
- State v. Jones 757 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
-
Distinguished
State v. Paulson
740 So. 2d 698
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
in which the Louisiana Supreme Court ruled that the defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in growing marijuana in his backyard.
- State v. Ellis 657 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
-
Distinguished
State v. Campbell
640 So. 2d 622
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
In Freeman , above, this court stated:
- State v. McHugh 630 So. 2d 1259 La. 1994
-
State v. Wright
562 So. 2d 1192
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
-
State v. Cassell
540 So. 2d 1219
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971); "
-
State v. Douget
507 So. 2d 283
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
- Distinguished State v. Freeman 503 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
- State v. Cook 482 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- State v. Ross 474 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
-
State v. Howard
448 So. 2d 713
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
preclude our interpretation of the inadvertency requirement.
-
State v. Thompson
448 So. 2d 666
La. 1984
2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971); (La.
-
State v. Lee
439 So. 2d 593
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
On appeal, defendant contends that the “plain view” doctrine is inapplicable
-
State v. Hughes
433 So. 2d 88
La. 1983
art. 162; State v. Lampkin, 253 La.
-
State v. Walker
430 So. 2d 1327
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
407 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963); (La.
-
State v. Reeves
427 So. 2d 403
La. 1983
2058 , 60 L.Ed.2d 663 (1979); (La.
- State v. Landry 414 So. 2d 674 La. 1982
- State v. Hernandez 410 So. 2d 1381 La. 1982
-
State v. Guiden
399 So. 2d 194
La. 1981
2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
-
State v. Rodriguez
396 So. 2d 1312
La. 1981
State v. Fearn, supra [ ].
-
State v. Stott
395 So. 2d 714
La. 1981
State v. Fearn, [ , La.1977], supra.
- State v. Dixon 391 So. 2d 836 La. 1980
- State v. Reed 388 So. 2d 776 La. 1980
-
State v. Dowling
387 So. 2d 1165
La. 1980
2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971); (La.
-
State v. Neyrey
383 So. 2d 1222
La. 1980
2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
- State v. Dupuis 378 So. 2d 934 La. 1979
-
State v. Mendoza
376 So. 2d 139
La. 1979
407 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963); ; State v. Ranker, supra .
-
State v. Rudolph
369 So. 2d 1320
La. 1979
They further claim that the seizure cannot be validated by reference to the plain view doctrine since none of the three criteria for its application, are present in this case.
- State v. Wilson 366 So. 2d 1328 La. 1978
-
State v. Williams
366 So. 2d 1369
La. 1978
See also, State v. Parker, supra; (La.
- State v. Wilbourn 364 So. 2d 995 La. 1978
-
State v. Bouffanie
364 So. 2d 971
La. 1978
2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
-
State v. Wilkens
364 So. 2d 934
La. 1978
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
-
State v. Banks
363 So. 2d 491
La. 1978
2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
- State v. Franklin 362 So. 2d 1383 La. 1978
-
State v. Lamartiniere
362 So. 2d 526
La. 1978
2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
- State v. Doucet 359 So. 2d 1239 La. 1978
-
Distinguished
State v. Byers
359 So. 2d 84
La. 1978
Both lower courts found the present case distinguishable from State v. Fearn, La., (1977), in which this Court struck down a seizure of marijuana under somewhat similar circumstances.
-
State v. Braud
357 So. 2d 545
La. 1978
992 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1968)
-
State v. Parker
355 So. 2d 900
La. 1978
2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
- State v. Franklin 353 So. 2d 1315 La. 1977
-
State v. Abram
353 So. 2d 1019
La. 1977
507 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967)
- State v. Sims 350 So. 2d 1189 La. 1977
- State v. Schouest 351 So. 2d 462 La. 1977
- State v. Hutchinson 349 So. 2d 1252 La. 1977