Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Schamburge, 344 So. 2d 997.

37 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Dionte Bracken La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. M. L. Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Washington, 93-2221 (La.App.
State v. ML JR. 35 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Washington, 93-2221 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Michael D. Sumrall La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Washington, 93-2221 (La.App.
State v. Sumrall 34 So. 3d 977 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Washington, 93-2221 (La.App.
State v. Shaw 969 So. 2d 1233 La. 2007
In reaching this conclusion, the court relied on two previous decisions, (La.
State v. Anders 941 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Quantell Derell Anders La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Washington, 93-2221 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Darwin Gauthier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Washington, 93-2221 (La.App.
State v. Gauthier 916 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Washington, 93-2221 (La.App.
State v. Lee 888 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Wilson 806 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Criticized State v. Odom 772 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
which held that the defendant could not be found to be a habitual offender on each of the two counts because convictions on more than one count entered on the same date should be treated as one conviction for applying the habitual offender statute, and State ex rel.
State v. Amato 698 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Fontenot, 618 So.2d at 920 .
State v. James 687 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Washington, 93-2221 (La.App.
State Ex Rel. Mims v. Butler 601 So. 2d 649 La. 1992
State Ex Rel. Porter v. Butler 573 So. 2d 1106 La. 1991
State v. Davis 569 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Robinson 563 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
(Assignment of error number 5); (Assignment of error number 6); (La.App.
State v. Caston 561 So. 2d 941 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Mims 535 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
to support his contention that for the purpose of the habitual offender statute multiple convictions entered on the same day must be treated as one conviction.
State v. Lennon 496 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Williams 482 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
1979), the Louisiana Supreme Court, (La.
State v. Alexander 430 So. 2d 621 La. 1983
496 , 50 L.Ed.2d 591 (1976); (1977); Sanders v. U.S., 415 F.2d 621 (5th Cir.1969) cert.
State v. Simmons 422 So. 2d 138 La. 1982
State v. Sherer 411 So. 2d 1050 La. 1982
State v. Edwards 406 So. 2d 1331 La. 1981
State v. Huckaby 368 So. 2d 1059 La. 1979
State v. Chapman 367 So. 2d 808 La. 1979
State v. Bolton 354 So. 2d 517 La. 1978
State v. Siegel 354 So. 2d 525 La. 1978
(all decided prior to the present sentencing hearing).
State v. Scott 355 So. 2d 231 La. 1977
State v. Dickerson 353 So. 2d 262 La. 1977
State v. Cobbs 350 So. 2d 168 La. 1977
State v. Wells 347 So. 2d 1152 La. 1977
State v. Taylor 347 So. 2d 172 La. 1977
Two of our recent decisions, State v. Schamburge, La., (1977) and State v. Cox, La., (1977), warrant our vacating defendant's sentence.
State v. Williams 346 So. 2d 181 La. 1977